ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Access control to people location information
Full text PdfPdf (357 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) archive
Volume 8 ,  Issue 4  (November 2005) table of contents
Pages: 424 - 456  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1094-9224
Authors
Urs Hengartner  University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Peter Steenkiste  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 253,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1108906.1108910
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Ubiquitous computing uses a variety of information for which access needs to be controlled. For instance, a person's current location is a sensitive piece of information that only authorized entities should be able to learn. Several challenges arise in the specification and implementation of policies controlling access to location information. For example, there can be multiple sources of location information. The sources can be within different administrative domains, which might allow different entities to specify policies, and policies need to be flexible. We address these issues in our design of a distributed access control mechanism for a people location system. Our design encodes policies as digital certificates, which enables decentralized storage of policies. We also present an algorithm for the discovery of distributed certificates. Furthermore, we discuss several privacy issues and show how our design addresses them. To show feasibility of our design, we built an example implementation based on SPKI/SDSI certificates. Using measurements, we quantify the influence of access control on query processing time. We also discuss trade-offs between RSA-based and DSA-based signature schemes for digital certificates.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bahl, P. and Padmanabhan, V. 2000. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2000. 775--784.
 
3
4
 
5
Bertino, E., Ferrari, E., and Squicciarini, A. C. 2003. Trust-χ: An XML framework for trust negotations. In Proceedings of Communications and Multimedia Security 2003. 146--157.
 
6
Bhatti, R. 2003. X-GTRBAC: An XML-based policy specification framework and architecture for enterprise-wide access control. Tech. Rep. 2003-27, CERIAS, Purdue University.
 
7
Blaze, M., Ioannidis, J., and Keromytis, A. 1999. The KeyNote trust-management system version 2. RFC 2704.
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
Cranor, L., Langheinrich, M., Marchiori, M., Presler-Marshall, M., and Reagle, J. 2002. The platform for privacy preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) specification. W3C Recommendation.
 
14
Day, M., Aggarwal, S., Mohr, G., and Vincent, J. 2000. Instant messaging/presence protocol requirements. RFC 2779.
 
15
 
16
Ellison, C., Frantz, B., Lampson, B., Rivest, R., Thomas, B., and Ylonen, T. 1999. SPKI certificate theory. RFC 2693.
 
17
Gandon, F. and Sadeh, N. 2003. A semantic eWallet to reconcile privacy and context awareness. In Proceedings of 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2003).
 
18
 
19
Godik, S. and Moses, T. 2003. eXtensible access control markup language (XACML) version 1.0. OASIS Standard.
 
20
 
21
Harter, A. and Hopper, A. 1994. A distributed location system for the active office. IEEE Network 8, 1 (Jan.), 62--70.
22
 
23
Hengartner, U. and Steenkiste, P. 2005. Exploiting hierarchical identity-based encryption for access control to pervasive computing information. In Proceedings of First IEEE/CreateNet International Conference on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communication Networks (IEEE/CreateNet SecureComm 2005). 384--393.
 
24
 
25
Howell, J. and Kotz, D. 2000b. End-to-end authorization. In Proceedings of 4th Symposium on Operating System Design & Implementation (OSDI 2000). 151--164.
 
26
ICAL. ftp://ftp.scriptics.com/pub/tcl/apps/ical/.
 
27
 
28
29
 
30
 
31
Li, N. and Mitchell, J. C. 2003. Understanding SPKI/SDSI using first-order logic. In Proceedings of 16th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW-16). 89-- 103.
 
32
 
33
34
 
35
 
36
Neuman, B. 1993. Proxy-based authorization and accounting for distributed systems. In Proceedings of International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 283--291.
 
37
Orkut. http://www.orkut.com.
38
 
39
 
40
Sollins, K. R. 1988. Cascaded authentication. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 156--163.
41
 
42
43
 
44
Ward, A., Jones, A., and Hopper, A. 1997. A new location technique for the active office. IEEE Personal Communications 4, 5 (Oct.), 42--47.
 
45
Ylonen, T. 2003. SSH transport layer protocol. Internet Draft.



REVIEW

"Fjodor J. Ruzic : Reviewer"

This comprehensive work on security issues discusses access control within a ubiquitous network environment, where people-location information is the key issue for privacy-safeguarding measures. The access control category is analyzed with the pub  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Urs Hengartner: colleagues
Peter Steenkiste: colleagues