ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Distributed selfish load balancing
Full text PdfPdf (227 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm table of contents
Miami, Florida
Pages: 354 - 363  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:0-89871-605-5
Authors
Petra Berenbrink  Simon Fraser University, Canada
Tom Friedetzky  University of Durham, U.K.
Leslie Ann Goldberg  University of Warwick, U.K.
Paul Goldberg  University of Warwick, U.K.
Zengjian Hu  Simon Fraser University, Canada
Russell Martin  University of Warwick, U.K.
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1109557.1109597
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Suppose that a set of m tasks are to be shared as equally as possible amongst a set of n resources. A game-theoretic mechanism to find a suitable allocation is to associate each task with a "selfish agent", and require each agent to select a resource, with the cost of a resource being the number of agents to select it. Agents would then be expected to migrate from overloaded to underloaded resources, until the allocation becomes balanced.Recent work has studied the question of how this can take place within a distributed setting in which agents migrate selfishly without any centralized control. In this paper we discuss a natural protocol for the agents which combines the following desirable features: It can be implemented in a strongly distributed setting, uses no central control, and has good convergence properties. For mn, the system becomes approximately balanced (an ε-Nash equilibrium) in expected time O(log log m). We show using a martingale technique that the process converges to a perfectly balanced allocation in expected time O(log log m + n4). We also give a lower bound of Ω (max{log log m, n}) for the convergence time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
A. Czumaj, C. Riley and C. Scheideler. Perfectly Balanced Allocation. Proc. 7th Annual International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques in Computer Science (RANDOM-APPROX), Princeton, NJ (2003), pp. 240--251.
 
4
 
5
E. Even-Dar, A. Kesselman and Y. Mansour. Convergence Time to Nash Equilibria. Proc. of the 30th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), Eindhoven, Netherlands (2003), pp. 502--513.
 
6
 
7
8
 
9
 
10
E. Koutsoupias and C. H. Papadimitriou. Worst-Case Equilibria. Proc. 16th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), Trier, Germany (1999), pp. 404--413.
 
11
12
 
13
M. Mitzenmacher, A. Richa and R. Sitaraman. The power of two random choices: A survey of the techniques and results. In Handbook of Randomized Computing, P. Pardalos, S. Rajasekaran, and J. Rolim (eds), Kluwer (2000), pp. 255--312.
 
14
T. Roughgarden. Many papers studying the cost of selfish routing in the flow-model are available at Tim Roughgarden's web page http://www.cs.cornell.edu/timr/ (which also has information and summaries).
15
 
16


Collaborative Colleagues:
Petra Berenbrink: colleagues
Tom Friedetzky: colleagues
Leslie Ann Goldberg: colleagues
Paul Goldberg: colleagues
Zengjian Hu: colleagues
Russell Martin: colleagues