ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the tandem duplication-random loss model of genome rearrangement
Full text PdfPdf (157 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm table of contents
Miami, Florida
Pages: 564 - 570  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:0-89871-605-5
Authors
Kamalika Chaudhuri  UC Berkeley
Kevin Chen  UC Berkeley
Radu Mihaescu  UC Berkeley
Satish Rao  UC Berkeley
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1109557.1109619
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We initiate the algorithmic study of a new model of genome rearrangement, the tandem duplication-random loss model, in which a genome evolves via successive rounds of tandem duplication of a contiguous segment of genes, followed by the loss of one copy of each of the duplicated genes. This model is well-known in the evolutionary biology literature, where it has been used to explain many of the known rearrangements in vertebrate mitochondrial genomes. Based on the model, we formalize a notion of distance between two genomes and show how to compute it efficiently for two interesting regions of the parameter space. We then consider median problems (i.e. finding the point which minimizes the sum of distances to a given set of points under some distance function) in the context of maximum parsimony phylogenetic reconstruction for these two special cases. Surprisingly, one of them turns out to correspond to the well-known rank aggregation problem, while the other corresponds to the biologically interesting case of whole genome duplication and loss, and we give an O(log log n) additive approximation algorithm for the latter.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Moret, J. Tang, and T. Warnow. Reconstructing phylogenies from gene-content and gene-order data. In O. Gascuel, editor, Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny. Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.
 
2
D. Sankoff and J. Nadeau, editors. Comparative Genomics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
 
3
 
4
M. Marron, K. M. Swenson, and B. M. E. Moret. Genomic distances under deletions and insertions. In COCOON, 2003.
 
5
 
6
K. M. Swenson, M. Marron, J. V. Earnest-DeYoung, and B. M. E. Moret. Approximating the true evolutionary distance between two genomes. Tech. Report TRCS-2004-15, Univ. of New Mexico, 2004.
 
7
J. L. Boore. The duplication/random loss model for gene rearrangement exemplified by mitochondrial genomes of deuterostome animals. In D. Sankoff and J. Nadeau, editors, Comparative Genomics. Kluwer, 2000.
 
8
R. L. Mueller and J. L. Boore. Molecular mechanisms of extensive mitochondrial gene rearrangement in plethodontid salamanders. Mol. Bio. Evol., 22(10):2104--2112, 2005.
 
9
C. Moritz, T. E. Dowling, and W. M. Brown. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relvance for population biology and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18:269--292, 1987.
 
10
S. Bensch and A. Härlid. Mitochondrial genomic rearrangements in songbirds. Mol. Biol. Evol., 17:107--113, 2000.
 
11
D. V. Lavrov, J. L. Boore, and W. M. Brown. Complete mtDNA sequences of two millipedes suggest a new model for mitochondrial gene rearrangements: duplication and nonrandom loss. Mol. Biol. Evol., 19(2):163--169, 2002.
 
12
J. G. Inoue, M. Miya, K. Tsukamoto, and M. Nishida. Evolution of the deep-sea gulper eel mitochondrial genomes: large-scale gene rearrangements originated within the eels. Mol. Biol. Evol., 20:1917--1924, November 2003.
 
13
I. Miklos and J. Hein. Genome rearrangement in mitochondria and its computational biology. In J. Lagergren, editor, Comparative Genomics: RECOMB 2004 Int. Workshop, volume 3388. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
 
14
S. Ohno. Evolution by Gene Duplication. Springer, New York, 1970.
 
15
M. Kellis, B. Birren, and E. Lander. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 428:617--624, 2004.
 
16
O. Jaillon, J. Aury, F. Brunet, J. Petit, N. Stange-Thomann, et al. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature, 431:946--957, October 2004.
 
17
J. Felsenstein. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, 2004.
18
19
 
20
 
21
I. Pe'er and R. Shamir. The median problem for breakpoints are NP-complete. Technical Report TR98--071, ECCC, 1998.
22
 
23
I. Pe'er and R. Shamir. Approximation algorithms for the permutations median problem in the breakpoint model. In D. Sankoff and J. Nadeau, editors, Comparative Genomics, pages 225--241. Kluwer Academic Press, 2000.
 
24
 
25
K. G. Helfenbein, W. M. Brown, and J. L. Boore. The complete mitochondrial genome of the articulate brachiopod Terebratalia transversa. Mol. Biol. Evol., 18(9):1734--1744, September 2001.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kamalika Chaudhuri: colleagues
Kevin Chen: colleagues
Radu Mihaescu: colleagues
Satish Rao: colleagues