ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The privacy and safety impact of technology choices for command, communications and control of the public highway
Full text PdfPdf (88 KB)
Source ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review archive
Volume 36 ,  Issue 1  (January 2006) table of contents
COLUMN: Editorial zone table of contents
Pages: 53 - 58  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:0146-4833
Author
Jon Crowcroft  University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 83,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1111322.1111335
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Monitoring, and command,communications and control of private vehicles on the public highway is now high on the political agenda. This is both because it is becoming feasible, and because it may be desirable. From the economic perspective, more efficient se of road resources may be achievable. From a safety perspective, it would clearly be good to reduce road injury and death statistics below the current "9/11"'s-worth per year in the UK (and other similar sized European countries).Various prototypes, proposals and projects are being undertaken. There are a number of technologies that interact as well as numerous legal, political and economic stakeholders. In this note, we pay particular attention to the impact on privacy and safety of di .erent approaches to the overall problem.The purpose is to draw attention to the potential unintended consequences that result from decisions being made at the time of writing, in this arena.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
John Doyle. Highly optimized tolerance. http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~complex/,2005.
 
3
Transport for London. Transport for london congestion charging technology trial report. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/downloads/pdf/congestion-charging/technology-%trials.pdf, 2004.
 
4
Royal Academy of Engineering. Transport 2050. http://www.raeng.org.uk/policy/reports/pdf/Transport_2050.pdf, 2005.
 
5
Bryan Parno and Adrian Perrig. Challenges in securing vehicular networks. In Proceedings of Worksho on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-IV),November 2005.
 
6
Heathcote Williams. Autogeddon. Jonathan Cape, 1991.