ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Is trust robust?: an analysis of trust-based recommendation
Full text PdfPdf (461 KB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
Sydney, Australia
SESSION: Recommendations I table of contents
Pages: 101 - 108  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-287-9
Authors
John O'Donovan  University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin
Barry Smyth  University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 155,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1111449.1111476
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Systems that adapt to input from users are susceptible to attacks from those same users. Recommender systems are common targets for such attacks since there are financial, political and many other motivations for influencing the promotion or demotion of recommendable items [2].Recent research has shown that incorporating trust and reputation models into the recommendation process can have a positive impact on the accuracy and robustness of recommendations. In this paper we examine the effect of using five different trust models in the recommendation process on the robustness of collaborative filtering in an attack situation. In our analysis we also consider the quality and accuracy of recommendations. Our results caution that including trust models in recommendation can either reduce or increase prediction shift for an attacked item depending on the model-building process used, while highlighting approaches that appear to be more robust.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Avesani, P. Massa, and R. Tiella. Moleskiing: a trust-aware decentralized recommender system. 1st Workshop on Friend of a Friend, Social Networking and the Semantic Web. Galway, Ireland, 2004.
 
2
R. Burke, B. Mobasher, and R. Bhaumik. Limited knowledge shilling attacks in collaborative filtering systems. In Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-05, Edinburgh.
 
3
R. Burke, B. Mobasher, R. Zabicki, and R. Bhaumik. Identifying attack models for secure recommendation. In Beyond Personalisation Workshop at the International Conferece on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 347--361, San Deigo, USA., 2005. ACM Press.
 
4
J. Golbeck and J. Hendler. Accuracy of metrics for inferring trust and reputation in semantic web-based social networks. In Proceedings of EKAW'04, pages LNAI 2416, p. 278 ff., 2004.
5
 
6
P. Massa and P. Avesani. Trust-aware collaborative filtering for recommender systems. Proceedings of International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Agia Napa, Cyprus, 2004.
 
7
P. Massa and B. Bhattacharjee. Using trust in recommender systems: an experimental analysis. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Trust Managment, Oxford, England, pages 221--235, 2004.
 
8
B. Mobasher, R. Burke, R. Bhaumik, and C. Williams. Effictive attack models for shilling item-based collaborative filtering systems. In WebKDD,, Chicago, Illinois, USA., 2005. ACM Press.
 
9
J. O'Donovan and B. Smyth. Eliciting trust values from recommendation errors. In Proceedings of the 18th International FLAIRS Conference, pages 289--294. AAAI Press, 2005.
10
11
 
12
 
13
14
15
 
16


Collaborative Colleagues:
John O'Donovan: colleagues
Barry Smyth: colleagues