skip to main content
article

Towards a process model of information systems implementation: the case of customer relationship management (CRM)

Published:31 January 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The failure rate of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) implementations is estimated to be greater than 65%. Lowering the failure rate and supporting the success of information systems (IS) are the ultimate goals of IS practitioners and researchers. However, most previous research in the area has focused on identifying factors such as critical success factors (CSFs) that are correlated with IS success. There has been little research on how IS implementation may lead to successful results. The state of knowledge in IS implementation may be likened to cooking with a list of ingredients but not the recipe. Drawing on process theory, this study examines the process of IS implementation by explaining how factors of IS implementation influence each other and how interactions among them produce results. Based on one successful case and two unsuccessful cases, we develop the process model of IS implementation, by which the process of IS implementation and the dynamics of IS success can be explained. The proposed model facilitates an understanding of how repeating patterns of IS failure can be reversed, and could serve to guide new IS implementation projects.

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1990). "A primer on sequence methods," Organization Science, Vol.1, No.4, pp. 375--392.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Abdel-Hamid, T.K. and Madnick, S.E. (1989). "Lessons learned from modelling the dynamics of software development," Communications of the ACM, Vol.32, No.12, pp. 1426--1455.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Akkerman, H. and Helden, K. V. (2002). "Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success factors," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.11, pp. 35--46.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Beath, C.M. (1991). "Supporting the information technology champion," MIS Quarterly, Vol.15, No.3, pp. 355--371.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Benjamin, R. and Levinson, E. (1993). "A framework for managing IT-enabled change," Sloan Management Review, Vol.34, No.4, pp. 23--33.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bostrom, R.P. and Heinen, J.S. (1977). "MIS Problems and Failures: a socio-technical perspective PART I: The causes," MIS Quarterly, Vol.1, No.3, pp. 17--32.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Butler, T. and Fitzgerald (1999). "Unpacking the systems development process: an empirical application of the CSF concept in a research context," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol.8, No.4, pp. 351--371.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Codington, S. and Wilson, T. (1994). "Information systems in the UK insurance industry," International Journal of Information Management, Vol.14, No.3, pp. 188--203.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Davenport, T.H. (2000). Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Davids, M. (1999). "How to avoid the 10 biggest mistakes in CRM," Journal of Business Strategy, Vol.20, No.6, pp. 22--11.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2001). "The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A ten-Year Update," Journal Management Information Systems, Vol.19, No.4, pp. 9--30.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). "Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable," Information Systems Research, Vol.3, No.1, pp. 60--95.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Desai, C., Wright, G., and Fletcher, K. (1998). "Barriers to successful implementation of database marketing: a cross-industry study," International Journal of Information Management, Vol.18, No.4, pp. 265--276.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Diffenbach, J. (1982). "Influence Diagrams for Complex Strategic Issues," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.3, pp. 133--146.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ginzberg, M.J., (1978). "Steps towards more effective implementation of MS and MIS," Interfaces, Vol.8, No.3, pp. 57--63.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Guimares, T., Igabaria, M., and Lu, M. (1992). "The determinants of DSS success: an integrated Model," Decision Sciences, Vol.23, pp. 409--430.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., and Newman, M. (1991). "Information systems development as social action: Theoretical perspective and practice," Omega, Vol.19, No.6, pp. 587--608.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Howell, J.M and Higgins, C.A. (1990). "Champions of Technological Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, pp. 317--341.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jones, M. and Nandhakuma, J. (1993). "Structured development? A structurational analysis of the development of an executive information system," in Avison, D. et al. (Eds), Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development, Nordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp. 475--496.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Keil, M., Rai, A., Mann, J.E.C., and Zhang, P. (2003). "Why software projects escalate: The importance of project management constructs," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.50, No.3, pp. 251--261.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Klein, H. and Myers, M. (1999). "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol.23, No.1, pp. 67--94.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lucas, H.C. (1981). Implementation, the key to successful information systems, New York: Columbia University Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Markus, L. and Robey, D. (1988). "Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research," Management Science, Vol.34, No.5, pp. 583--598.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Markus, L. and Tanis, C. (2000). "The Enterprise System Experience - From adoption to success," in Zmud, R. (Ed.), Framing the domain of IT management, Pinnaflex Education Resources, Inc., pp. 173--207.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Monge, P.R. (1990). "Theoretical and analytical issues in studying organizational processes," Organization Science, Vol.1, No.4, pp. 406--430.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining Organizational Behaviour, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers, M.D. (1995). "Dialectical hermeneutics: A theoretical framework for the implementation of information system," Information Systems Journal, Vol.5, No.1, pp. 51--70.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Newman, M. and Robey, D. (1992). "A social process model of user-analyst relationships," MIS Quarterly, Vol.16, No.2, pp. 249--266.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Orlikowski, W.J. and Robey, D. (1991). "Information technology and the structuring of organizations," Information Systems Research, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 143--169.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). "The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations," Organization Science, Vol.3, No.3, pp. 398--427.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Orlikowski, W.J. (1993). "CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development," MIS Quarterly, Vol.17. No.3, pp. 309--340.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Orlikowski, W.J. (1996). "Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective," Information Systems Research, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 63--92.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Pan, S.L. and Lee, J.N. (2003). "Using e-CRM for a Unified View of the Customer," Communications of ACM, Vol.6, No.1, pp. 95--99.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Rai, A., Lang, S.S., and Welker, R.B. (2002). "Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis," Information Systems Research, Vol.13, No.1, pp. 50--60.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Reich, B.H. and Benbasat, I. (1990). "An empirical investigation of factors influencing the success of customer-oriented strategic systems," Information Systems Research, Vol.1, No.3, pp. 325--347.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Rigby, D., Reichheld, F., and Schefter, P. (2002). "Avoid the four perils of CRM," Harvard Business Review, Vol.80, No.2, pp. 101--109.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Robey, D. and Newman, M. (1996). "Sequential patterns in information systems development: An application of a social process model," ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol.14, No.1, pp. 30--63.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Rockart, J.F. (1979). "Chief executives define their own data needs," in Rockart, J.F., and Bullen, C.V. (Eds.), The rise of Managerial Computing, Sloan School of Management, MIT.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryals, L. and Knox, S. (2001). "Cross-functional issues in the implementation of relationship marketing through customer relationship management," European Management Journal, Vol.19, No.5, pp. 534--542.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sabherwal, R. and Robey, D. (1993). "An empirical taxonomy of implementation processes based on sequences of events in information system development," Organization Science, Vol.4, No.4, pp. 548--576.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Schmidt, R., Lyyntinen, K., Keil, M., and Cule, P. (2001). "Identifying Software Project Risks: An international Delphi study," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.17, No.4, pp. 5--36.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Seddon, P.B. (1997). "A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success," Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 240--253.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Shaw, T. and Jarvenpaa, S. (1997). "Process models in information systems," in Lee, A et al. (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research, London, UK, Chapman & Hall, pp. 71--99.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Swanson, E.B. (1988). Information Systems Implementation: Bridging the gap between design and utilization, Homewood, IL.: Irwin.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Van de Ven, A.H. (1992). "Suggestions for studying process: A research note," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp. 169--188.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Williams, J. and Ramaprasad, A. (1996). "A taxonomy of critical success factors," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.5, No.5, pp. 250--260.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Wixom, B.H. and Watson, H.J. (2001). "An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success," MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No.1, pp. 17--41.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Worren, N.A.A, Ruddle, K., and Moore, K. (1999). "From Organizational Development to Change Management: The emergence of a new profession," The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, Vol.35, No.3, pp. 273--286.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Yin, R. (1984). Case Study Research- Design and Methods, London: Sage.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards a process model of information systems implementation: the case of customer relationship management (CRM)

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader