ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Managing availability: Supporting lightweight negotiations to handle interruptions
Full text PdfPdf (2.40 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) archive
Volume 12 ,  Issue 4  (December 2005) table of contents
Pages: 356 - 387  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:1073-0516
Authors
Mikael Wiberg  Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Steve Whittaker  Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 139,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1121112.1121114
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Interruptions are a central aspect of working life. The prevalence of remote co-workers and the use of mobile technology mean that interruptions are more prevalent, and workers have to learn to manage availability. To understand general issues in availability management, we carried out a naturalistic study of how interruptions are handled in face-to-face situations. We found that availability management requires negotiation, that it is also highly dependent on awareness about the availability of others, and that it demands cognitive effort to shift attention to the interruption. On the basis of these observations, we developed a technology, named. The Negotiator, that embodies three main design requirements: (a) support for negotiation, (b) contextual information about when a recipient is available for a call, (c) lightweightness to reduce attention overhead. We carried out an experimental study of interruption management using this technology. The interface satisfied the original design requirements, that is, people, were able to use it effectively to negotiate times to talk, while successfully carrying out an intellectually demanding activity. Contrary to our expectations, however, people preferred to take responsibility for returning calls rather than delegating them, and they preferred to schedule calls as soon as possible rather than deferring them. We suggest that there are social reasons why people do this. They feel a social obligation to return calls as soon as possible so as not to inconvenience others and also to be responsible for making these calls themselves. They also take calls sooner to avoid having to remember future conversational commitments. We discuss the theoretical and technical implications of these findings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
Brown, B. and Perry, M. 2000. Why don't telephones have off switches? Understanding the use of everyday technologies; A research note. Interact. Comput. 12, 6, 623--634.
 
5
Davenport, H. and Beck, J. 2001. The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business. Harvard Business School Press.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
 
13
Kakihara, M., SØrensen, C., and Wiberg, M. 2002. Fluid interaction in mobile work practices. Tokyo Mobile Roundtable (May) Tokyo, Japan.
 
14
Kraut, R., Fish, R., Rooth, R., and Chalfonte, B. 1993. Informal communication in organizations: form, function and technology. In Groupware and Computer-Supported Co-operative Work. R. Baecker, Ed., Morgan Kaufmann, 287--314.
15
16
17
 
18
Mintzberg. H. 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. Harvard University Press.
19
20
21
22
 
23
Panko, R. R. 1992. Managerial communication patterns. J. Oranizat. Comput. 2, 1, 95--122.
24
 
25
Rouncefield, M., Viller, S., Hughes, J., and Rodden, T. 1995. Working with constant interruption: CSCW and the small office. The Informat. Soc. 11, 4, 173--188.
 
26
27
 
28
Schegloff E. 1968. Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist. 70, 1075--1095.
 
29
Solso, R., Johnson, H., and Beal, K. 1998. Experimental Psychology: A Case Approach, 6th Ed. Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
 
30
Sproull, L. 1984. The nature of managerial attention. Advances Inform. Process. Organizat. 1, 9--27.
31
32
33
 
34
Whittaker, S. 2002. Theories and methods in mediated communication. In The Handbook of Discourse Processes. Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M., and Goldman, S. Ed. Erlbaum.
35
36
37
38
39
 
40
41
 
42
 
43
Wiberg, M. 2001. In between mobile meetings: Exploring seamless ongoing interaction support for mobile CSCW. PhD thesis, Department of Informatics, Umeå University, Sweden.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Mikael Wiberg: colleagues
Steve Whittaker: colleagues