ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Open questions in the theory of semifeasible computation
Full text PdfPdf (476 KB)
Source ACM SIGACT News archive
Volume 37 ,  Issue 1  (March 2006) table of contents
COLUMN: SIGACT news complexity theory column 50 table of contents
Pages: 47 - 65  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:0163-5700
Authors
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1122480.1122495
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The study of semifeasible algorithms was initiated by Selman's work a quarter of century ago [Sel79,Sel81,Sel82]. Informally put, this research stream studies the power of those sets L for which there is a deterministic (or in some cases, the function may belong to one of various nondeterministic function classes) polynomial-time function f such that when at least one of x and y belongs to L, then f(x, y) ∈ L ∩ {x, y}. The intuition here is that it is saying: "Regarding membership in L, if you put a gun to my head and forced me to bet on one of x or y as belonging to L, my money would be on f(x, y) ."In this article, we present a number of open problems from the theory of semifeasible algorithms. For each we present its background and review what partial results, if any, are known.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
{ABG90} A. Amir, R. Beigel, and W. Gasarch. Some connections between bounded query classes and non-uniform complexity. In Proceedings of the 5th Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, pages 232--243. IEEE Computer Society Press, July 1990.
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
{Bei88} R. Beigel. NP-hard sets are P-superterse unless R=NP. Technical Report 88-04, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, August 1988.
 
8
 
9
 
10
{BLS85} R. Book, T. Long, and A. Selman. Qualitative relativizations of complexity classes. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 30(3):395--413, 1985.
 
11
{Cai01} J. Cai. Sp2 ⊆ ZPPNP. In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
{FH05} P. Faliszewski and L. Hemaspaandra. Advice for semifeasible sets and the complexity-theoretic cost(lessness) of algebraic properties. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 16(5):913--928, 2005.
16
 
17
{HHN+95} L. Hemaspaandra, A. Hoene, A. Naik, M. Ogiwara, A. Selman, T. Thierauf, and J. Wang. Nondeterministically selective sets. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 6(4):403--416, 1995.
 
18
 
19
{HHW05} E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and O. Watanabe. The complexity of kings. Technical Report TR-870, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, June 2005.
 
20
 
21
 
22
{HNP98} L. Hemaspaandra, C. Nasipak, and K. Parkins. A note on linear-nondeterminism, linear-sized, Karp-Lipton advice for the P-selective sets. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 4(8):670--674, 1998.
 
23
 
24
 
25
{HOZZ} L. Hemaspaandra, M. Ogihara, M. Zaki, and M. Zimand. The complexity of finding top-Tada-equivalence-class members. Theory of Computing Systems. To appear.
 
26
 
27
 
28
{HT06} Hemaspaandra and L. Torenvliet. P-selectivity, immunity, and the power of one bit. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, January 2006. To appear.
 
29
{Joc68} C. Jockusch. Semirecursive sets and positive reducibility. Transactions of the AMS, 131(2):420--436, 1968.
 
30
31
 
32
{Ko83} K. Ko. On self-reducibility and weak P-selectivity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 26:209--221, 1983.
 
33
 
34
{KS85} K. Ko and U. Schöning. On circuit-size complexity and the low hierarchy in NP. SIAM Journal on Computing, 14(1):41--51, 1985.
 
35
 
36
 
37
{Lan53} H. Landau. On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies, III: The condition for score structure. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 15:1--148, 1953.
 
38
{LLS75} R. Ladner, N. Lynch, and A. Selman. A comparison of polynomial time reducibilities. Theoretical Computer Science, 1(2):103--124, 1975.
 
39
{LS95} T. Long and M. Sheu. A refinement of the low and high hierarchies. Mathematical Systems Theory, 28:299--327, 1995.
 
40
 
41
42
 
43
 
44
 
45
 
46
 
47
{Sch83} U. Schöning. A low and a high hierarchy within NP. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 27:14--28, 1983.
 
48
{Sel79} A. Selman. P-selective sets, tally languages, and the behavior of polynomial time reducibilities on NP. Mathematical Systems Theory, 13:55--65, 1979.
 
49
{Sel81} A. Selman. Some observations on NP real numbers and P-selective sets. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 23:326--332, 1981.
 
50
{Sel82} A. Selman. Analogues of semirecursive sets and effective reducibilities to the study of NP complexity. Information and Control, 52:36--51, 1982.
 
51
 
52
 
53
 
54
{Tha03} M. Thakur. On optimal advice for P-selective sets. Technical Report TR-819, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, November 2003.
 
55
{Tod91} S. Toda. On polynomial-time truth-table reducibilities of intractable sets to P-selective sets. Mathematical Systems Theory, 24(2):69--82, 1991.
 
56
{Ver94} N. Vereshchagin, January 1994. Personal Communication.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Piotr Faliszewski: colleagues
Lane Hemaspaandra: colleagues