ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Compressive wireless sensing
Full text PdfPdf (765 KB)
Source Information Processing In Sensor Networks archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks table of contents
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
SESSION: Main track--wireless sensor networking table of contents
Pages: 134 - 142  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-334-4
Authors
Waheed Bajwa  University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Jarvis Haupt  University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Akbar Sayeed  University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Robert Nowak  University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 129,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1127777.1127801
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Compressive Sampling is an emerging theory that is based on the fact that a relatively small number of random projections of a signal can contain most of its salient information. In this paper, we introduce the concept of Compressive Wireless Sensing for sensor networks in which a fusion center retrieves signal field information from an ensemble of spatially distributed sensor nodes. Energy and bandwidth are scarce resources in sensor networks and the relevant metrics of interest in our context are 1) the latency involved in information retrieval; and 2) the associated power-distortion trade-off. It is generally recognized that given sufficient prior knowledge about the sensed data (e.g., statistical characterization, homogeneity etc.), there exist schemes that have very favorable power-distortion-latency trade-offs. We propose a distributed matched source-channel communication scheme, based in part on recent results in compressive sampling theory, for estimation of sensed data at the fusion center and analyze, as a function of number of sensor nodes, the trade-offs between power, distortion and latency. Compressive wireless sensing is a universal scheme in the sense that it requires no prior knowledge about the sensed data. This universality, however, comes at the cost of optimality (in terms of a less favorable power-distortion-latency trade-off) and we quantify this cost relative to the case when sufficient prior information about the sensed data is assumed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
E. Candès, J. Romberg, and T. Tao. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. Submitted, Jun. 2004.
 
3
D. L. Donoho. Compressed sensing. Manuscript, Sep. 2004.
 
4
M. Gastpar and M. Vetterli. Source-channel communication in sensor networks. In Proc. 2nd Intl. Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'03), pages 162--177, Apr. 2003.
5
 
6
M. Gastpar and M. Vetterli. Power, spatio-temporal bandwidth, and distortion in large sensor networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 23(4):745--754, Apr. 2005.
 
7
G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, and G. Polya. Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, 1967.
 
8
J. Haupt and R. Nowak. Signal reconstruction from noisy random projections. Submitted to IEEE Trans. Information Theory, Mar. 2005.
 
9
P. Ishwar, A. Kumar, and K. Ramchandran. Distributed sampling for dense sensor networks: A bit-conservation principle. In Proc. 2nd Intl. Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'03), Apr. 2003.
 
10
K. Liu and A. M. Sayeed. Optimal distributed detection strategies for wireless sensor networks. In Proc. 42nd Annual Allerton Conference on Commun., Control and Comp., Oct. 2004.
 
11
D. Marco, E. Duarte-Melo, M. Liu, and D. Neuhoff. On the many-to-one transport capacity of a dense wireless sensor network and the compressibility of its data. In Proc. 2nd Intl. Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'03), pages 1--16, Apr. 2003.
 
12
R. Mudumbai, J. Hespanha, U. Madhow, and G. Barriac. Scalable feedback control for distributed beamforming in sensor networks. In Proc. Int. Symp. Info. Th. (ISIT'05), Sep. 2005.
 
13
R. Nowak, U. Mitra, and R. Willett. Estimating inhomogeneous fields using wireless sensor networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 22(6):999--1006, 2004.
 
14
S. S. Pradhan, J. Kusuma, and K. Ramchandran. Distributed compression in a dense microsensor network. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(2):51--60, Mar. 2002.
 
15
S. D. Servetto. On the feasibility of large-scale wireless sensor networks. In Proc. 40th Annual Allerton Conference on Commun., Control and Comp., 2002.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Waheed Bajwa: colleagues
Jarvis Haupt: colleagues
Akbar Sayeed: colleagues
Robert Nowak: colleagues