ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A space-time diffusion scheme for peer-to-peer least-squares estimation
Full text PdfPdf (557 KB)
Source Information Processing In Sensor Networks archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks table of contents
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
SESSION: Main track--sensing and estimation methodologies table of contents
Pages: 168 - 176  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-334-4
Authors
Lin Xiao  Caltech, Pasadena, CA
Stephen Boyd  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sanjay Lall  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1127777.1127806
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider a sensor network in which each sensor takes measurements, at various times, of some unknown parameters, corrupted by independent Gaussian noises. Each node can take a finite or infinite number of measurements, at arbitrary times (ie, asynchronously). We propose a space-time diffusion scheme, that relies only on peer-to-peer communication, and allows every node to asymptotically compute the global maximum-likelihood estimate of the unknown parameters. At each iteration, information is diffused across the network by a temporal update step and a spatial update step. Both steps update each node's state by a weighted average of its current value and locally available data: new measurements for the time update, and neighbors' data for the spatial update. At any time, any node can compute a local weighted least-squares estimate of the unknown parameters, which converges to the global maximum-likelihood solution. With an infinite number of measurements, these estimates converge to the true parameter values in the sense of mean-square convergence. We show that this scheme is robust to unreliable communication links, and works in a network with dynamically changing topology.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Alanyali, S. Venkatesh, O. Savas, and S. Aeron. Distributed Bayesian hypothesis testing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, pages 5369--5374, Boston, June 2004.
 
2
 
3
V. D. Blondel, J. M. Hendrickx, A. Olshevsky, and J. N. Tsitsiklis. Convergence in multiagent coordination, consensus, and flocking. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2005.
 
4
 
5
S. Boyd, A. Ghosh, B. Prabhakar, and D. Shah. Gossip algorithms: design, analysis and applications. to appear in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2005.
 
6
 
7
8
 
9
Y. Hatano and M. Mesbahi. Agreement over random networks. In Proceedings of 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlantis, Bahamas, December 2004.
 
10
 
11
A. Jadbabaie, J. Lin, and A. S. Morse. Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Transactions Automatic Control, 48(6):988--1001, June 2003.
 
12
Z.-Q. Luo. An isotropic universal decentralized estimation scheme for a bandwidth constrained ad hoc sensor network. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2005. Special issue on Self-Organizing Distributed Collaborative Sensor Networks, to appear.
 
13
L. Moreau. Stability of multiagent systems with time-dependent communication links. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 50:169--182, 2005.
 
14
R. Olfati-Saber and R. M. Murray. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(9):1520--1533, September 2004.
 
15
K. Plarre and P. R. Kumar. Extended message passing algorithm for inference in loopy gaussian graphical models. Ad Hoc Networks, 2:153--169, 2004.
 
16
W. Ren and R. W. Beard. Consensus seeking in multi-agent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2005. to appear.
17
 
18
 
19
S.-H. Teng, C. W. Wong, and D. T. Lee. Unstructured mesh generation: theory, practice, and perspectives. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applicatons, 10(3):227--266, 2000.
 
20
J. N. Tsitsiklis. Problems in Decentralized Decision Making and Computation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1984.
 
21
J. N. Tsitsiklis, D. P. Bertsekas, and M. Athans. Distributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 31(9):803--812, September 1986.
 
22
L. Xiao and S. Boyd. Fast linear iterations for distributed averaging. Systems and Control Letters, 53:65--78, 2004.
 
23


Collaborative Colleagues:
Lin Xiao: colleagues
Stephen Boyd: colleagues
Sanjay Lall: colleagues