ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Statistical gate delay calculation with crosstalk alignment consideration
Full text PdfPdf (110 KB)
Source Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI archive
Proceedings of the 16th ACM Great Lakes symposium on VLSI table of contents
Philadelphia, PA, USA
SESSION: Timing optimization table of contents
Pages: 223 - 228  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-347-6
Authors
Andrew B. Kahng  UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA
Bao Liu  UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA
Xu Xu  UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1127908.1127961
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study gate delay variation caused by crosstalk aggressor alignment, i.e., difference of signal arrival times in coupled neighboring interconnects. This effect is as significant as multiple-input switching on gate delay variation [2]. We establish a functional relationship between driver gate delay and crosstalk alignment by deterministic circuit simulation, and derive closed form formulas for statistical distributions of driver gate delay and output signal arrival time.Our proposed method can be smoothly integrated into a static timing analyzer, which runtime is dominated by sampling deterministic delay calculation, while probabilistic computation and updating take constant time. Our experimental results on 70nm technology global interconnect structures and 130nm technology industry designs show respectively 159:4% and 147:4% differences in mean and standard deviation of gate delay without crosstalk aggressor alignment consideration, while our method gives within 2:57% and 3:86% offset in gate output signal arrival time mean and standard deviation, respectively.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
 
4
Berkeley Predictive Technology Model, http://www-device.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ptm/.
5
6
 
7
8
 
9
A. Odabasioglu, M. Celik and L. T. Pileggi, "PRIMA: Passive Reduced-Order Interconnect Macromodeling Algorithm," IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 17, no. 8, August 1998, pp. 645--654.
10
11
 
12
M. Orshansky, L. Milor, P. Chen, K. Keutzer, C. Hu, "Impact of spatial intrachip gate length variability on the performance of high-speed digital circuits," IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2002, pp. 544--553.
13
14
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew B. Kahng: colleagues
Bao Liu: colleagues
Xu Xu: colleagues