ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the decidability of phase ordering problem in optimizing compilation
Full text PdfPdf (133 KB)
Source Conference On Computing Frontiers archive
Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Computing frontiers table of contents
Ischia, Italy
SESSION: Compilation and dynamic optimization table of contents
Pages: 147 - 156  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-302-6
Authors
Sid-Ahmed-Ali Touati  University of Versailles, Versailles cedex, France
Denis Barthou  University of Versailles, Versailles cedex, France
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 63,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1128022.1128042
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We are interested in the computing frontier around an essential question about compiler construction: having a program P and a set M of non parametric compiler optimization modules (called also phases), is it possible to find a sequence s of these phases such that the performance (execution time for instance) of the final generated program P′ is "optimal" ? We prove in this article that this problem is undecidable in two general schemes of optimizing compilation: iterative compilation and library optimization/generation. Fortunately, we give some simplified cases when this problem be-comes decidable, and we provide some algorithms (not necessary efficient) that can answer our main question. Another essential question that we are interested in is parame-ters space exploration in optimizing compilation (tuning optimizing compilation parameters). In this case, we assume a fixed sequence of optimization, but each optimization phase is allowed to have a parameter. We try to figure out how to compute the best parameter values for all program transformations when the compilation sequence is given. We also prove that this general problem is undecidable and we provide some simplified decidable instances.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Cohen and S. Girbal and O. Temam. A Polyhedral Approach to Ease the Composition of Program Transformations. In Proceedings of Euro-Par'04, Aug. 2004.
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
L. Eeckhout, H. Vandierendonck, and K. D. Bosschere. Quantifying the Impact of Input Data Sets on Program Behavior and its Applications. Journal of Instruction-Level Parallelism, 5, 2003. Electronic journal : www.jilp.org.
 
7
S. M. Freudenberger and J. C. Ruttenberg. Phase Ordering of Register Allocation and Instruction Scheduling. In Code Generation - Concepts, Tools, Techniques. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Code Generation, pages 146--172, London, 1992. Springer-Verlag.
8
 
9
 
10
J. P. Jones. Universal Diophantine Equation. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 47(3):403--410, 1982.
 
11
K. Kennedy, N. McIntosh, and K. McKinley. Static Performance Estimation in a Parallelizing Compiler. Technical Report CRPC-TR92204, Center for Research on Parallel Computation, Rice University, May 1992.
12
 
13
 
14
M. Pschel and J. M. F. Moura and J. Johnson and D. Padua and M. Veloso and B. Singer and J. Xiong and F. Franchetti and A. Gacic and Y. Voronenko and K. Chen and R. W. Johnson and N. Rizzolo. SPIRAL: Code Generation for DSP Transforms. Proceedings of the IEEE special issue on Program Generation, Optimization and Adaptation, (2):232--275, 2005.
 
15
 
16
W. Mangione-Smith, T.-P. Shih, S. Abraham, and E. Davidson. Approaching a Machine-Application Bound in Delivered Performance on Scientifique Code. In Proceedings of the IEEE, volume 81, pages 1166--1178, Aug. 1993.
 
17
 
18
R. Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1991.
 
19
R. Whaley and A. Petitet and J. Dongarra. Automated Empirical Optimizations of Software and the ATLAS Project. Parallel Computing, 27(1-2):3--25, 2001. ISSN 0167--8191.
 
20
 
21
T. Alexander. Performance Prediction for Loop Restructuring Optimization. Master thesis, University of Carnegie Mellon. Physics/Computer Science Department, July 1993.
 
22
23
 
24
S. Triantafyllis, M. Vachharajani, and D. I. August. Compiler Optimization-Space Exploration. Journal of Instruction-Level Parallelism, 7, Jan. 2005. Electronic journal: www.jilp.org.
25
26

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sid-Ahmed-Ali Touati: colleagues
Denis Barthou: colleagues