|
ABSTRACT
Location-based Access Control (LBAC) techniques allow taking users' physical location into account when determining their access privileges. In this paper, we present an approach to LBAC aimed at integrating location-based conditions along with a generic access control model, so that a requestor can be granted or denied access by checking her location as well as her credentials. Our LBAC model includes a novel way of taking into account the limitations of the technology used to ascertain the location of the requester. Namely, we describe how location verification can be encapsulated as a service, representing location technologies underlying it in terms of two semantically uniform service level agreement (SLA) parameters called confidence and timeout. Based on these parameters, we present the formal definition of a number of location-based predicates, their management, evaluation, and enforcement. The challenges that such an extension to traditional access control policies inevitably carries are discussed also with reference to detailed examples of LBAC policies.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
M. Anisetti, C.A. Ardagna, V. Bellandi, and E. Damiani. Positioning method and system for mobile communications networks, related networks and computer program product. European Patent No. 05425643.3, Deposited in date 15 September 2005.
|
| |
3
|
C.A. Ardagna, E. Damiani, S. De Capitani di Vimercati, and P. Samarati. Towards privacy-enhanced authorization policies and languages. In Proc. of the 19th IFIP WG11.3 Working Conference on Data and Application Security, Nathan Hale Inn, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA, August 7--10 2005.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
C. Bettini, X.S. Wang, and S. Jajodia. Protecting privacy against location-based personal identification. In Proc. of the 2nd VLDB Workshop on Secure Data Management, Trondheim, Norway, September 2005.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
E. Damiani, S. De Capitani di Vimercati, S. Paraboschi, and P. Samarati. Managing and sharing servents' reputations in p2p systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15(4):840--854, July/August 2003.
|
| |
8
|
D. Faria and D. Cheriton. No long-term secrets: Location-based security in overprovisioned wireless lans. In Proc. of the Third ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-III), San Diego, USA, November 2004.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
I. Getting. The global positioning system. IEEE Spectrum, 30(12):36--47, December 1993.
|
| |
11
|
C. Hauser and M. Kabatnik. Towards Privacy Support in a Global Location Service. In Proc. of the IFIP Workshop on IP and ATM Traffic Management (WATM/EUNICE 2001), Paris, France, 2001.
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
H. Hu and D.L. Lee. Energy-efficient monitoring of spatial predicates over moving objects. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 28(3):19--26, 2005.
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
OASIS. eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) Version 1.0, 2003. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml.
|
| |
22
|
B. Parkinson, J. Spilker, P. Axelrad, and P. Enge, editors. Global Positioning System: Theory and Application, Volume II. American Institute of Astronautics and Aeronautics (AIAA), 1996.
|
| |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
T.W. van der Horst, T. Sundelin, K.E. Seamons, and C.D. Knutson. Mobile trust negotiation: Authentication and authorization in dynamic mobile networks. In Proc. of the Eighth IFIP Conference on Communications and Multimedia Security, Lake Windermere, England, September 2004.
|
 |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
|
|