Reflections on network architecture: an active networking perspective

Abstract

After a long period when networking research seemed to be focused mainly on making the existing Internet work better, interest in "clean slate" approaches to network architecture seems to be growing. Beginning with the DARPA program in the mid-1990's, researchers working on active networks explored such an approach, based on the idea of a programming interface as the basic interoperability mechanism of the network. This note draws on the author's experiences in that effort and attempts to extract some observations or "lessons learned" that may be relevant to more general network architecture research.

References

1. D. Alexander, W. Arbaugh, M. Hicks, P. Kakkar, A. Keromytis, J. Moore, C. Gunter, S. Nettles, and J. Smith. The Switchware Active Network Architecture. IEEE Network Special Issue on Active and Controllable Networks, 12(3):29--36, 1998.
2. S. Bhattacharjee, K. Calvert, Y. Chae, S. Merugu, M. Sanders, and E. Zegura. Canes: An execution environment for composable services. In DARPA Active Networks Conference and Exposition, pages 255--272, May 2002.
3. K. Calvert, J. Griffioen, B. Mullins, A. Sehgal, and S. Wen. Concast: Design and implementation of an active network service. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communications, 19(3), March 2001.
4. K. Calvert, J. Griffioen, and S. Wen. Lightweight network support for scalable end-to-end services. In ACM SIGCOMM 2002, pages 265--278, August 2002.
5. D. Clark et al. New arch: Future generation network architecture (final technical report), 2004. http://www.isi.edu/newarch/iDOCS/final.finalreport.pdf.
6. David D. Clark. The design philosophy of the DARPA internet protocols. In ACM SIGCOMM '88, pages 106--114, August 1988.
7. K. L. Calvert (editor). Architectural Framework for Active Networks. DARPA Active Networks Working Group Draft, December 2001.
8. L. L. Peterson (editor). NodeOS Interface specification. DARPA Active Networks Working Group Draft, January 2001.
9. S. Murphy (editor). Security Architecture for Active Nets. DARPA Active Networks Working Group Draft, November 2001.
10. D. Scott Alexander et. al. Active Network Encapsulation Protocol (ANEP), 1997. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/dsl/switchware/ANEP/.
11. Sally Floyd and Vern Paxson. Difficulties in simulating the internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 9(4):392--403, August 2001.
12. National Science Foundation. Future internet design program. http://find.isi.edu.
13. T. Griffin and G. Wilfong. An analysis of BGP convergence properties. In ACM SIGCOMM '99, pages 277--288, September 1999.
14. Michael W. Hicks, Pankaj Kakkar, Jonathan T. Moore, Carl A. Gunter, and Scott Nettles. PLAN: A packet language for active networks. In International Conference on Functional Programming, pages 86--93, 1998.
15. L. Peterson, Y. Gottlieb, M. Hibler, P. Tullmann, J. Lepreau, S. Schwab, H. Dandekar, A. Purtell, and J. Hartman. An OS Interface for Active Routers. IEEE Journal on Selected areas of Communicasitons, 19(3), March 2001.
16. B. Raghavan and A. Snoeren. A system for authenticated policy-compliant routing. In ACM SIGCOMM 2004, pages 167--178, August 2004.
17. J. M. Smith, K. L. Calvert, S. L. Murphy, H. K. Orman, and L. L. Peterson. Activating networks: A progress report. IEEE Computer, 32(4), April 1999.
18. David L. Tennenhouse and David J Wetherall. Towards an Active Network Architecture. Computer Communication Review, 26(2), April 1996.
19. Christian F. Tschudin. The Messenger Environment M0 - a Condensed Description. http://cui.unige.ch/tios/msgr/m0/doc/overview.html, May 1997.
20. David J. Wetherall, John V. Guttag, and David L. Tennenhouse. ANTS: A Toolkit for Building and Dynamically Deploying Network Protocols. In IEEE OPENARCH '98, April 1998.

Index Terms

• Networks

  • Network protocols

    • Network protocol design

  • Network types

    • Packet-switching networks