ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Propositional computability logic I
Full text PdfPdf (209 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL) archive
Volume 7 ,  Issue 2  (April 2006) table of contents
Pages: 302 - 330  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1529-3785
Author
Giorgi Japaridze  Villanova University, Villanova, PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1131313.1131318
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the same sense as classical logic is a formal theory of truth, the recently initiated approach called computability logic is a formal theory of computability. It understands (interactive) computational problems as games played by a machine against the environment, their computability as existence of a machine that always wins the game, logical operators as operations on computational problems, and validity of a logical formula as being a scheme of “always computabl ” problems. Computability logic has been introduced semantically, and now among its main technical goals is to axiomatize the set of valid formulas or various natural fragments of that set. The present contribution signifies a first step towards this goal. It gives a detailed exposition of a soundness and completeness proof for the rather new type of a deductive propositional system CL1, the logical vocabulary of which contains operators for the so called parallel and choice operations, and the atoms of which represent elementary problems, that is, predicates in the standard sense.This article is self-contained as it explains all relevant concepts. While not technically necessary, familiarity with the foundational paper “Introduction to Computability Logi ” [Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 123 (2003), pp.1-99] would greatly help the reader in understanding the philosophy, underlying motivations, potential and utility of computability logic---the context that determines the value of the present results.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
van Benthem, J. 2001. Logic in games. Tech. rep., University of Amsterdam. ILLC preprint.
 
3
Blass, A. 1992. A game semantics for linear logic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 56, 183--220.
 
4
 
5
Japaridze, G. 1997. A constructive game semantics for the language of linear logic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 85, 87--156.
 
6
Japaridze, G. 2002. The logic of tasks. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 117, 263--295.
 
7
Japaridze, G. 2003. Introduction to computability logic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 123, 1--99.
 
8
Japaridze, G. 2004. Computability logic: A formal theory of interaction. Tech. Rep. arXiv:cs.LO/0404024, Villanova University. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0404024.
 
9
Lorenzen, P. 1961. Ein dialogishes Konstruktivitätskriterium. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Mathematics. PWN, (Warsaw) 193--200.
10
 
11
Turing, A. 1936. On computable numbers with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. In Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2:42, 230--265.
 
12