| Propositional computability logic I |
| Full text |
Pdf
(209 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL)
archive
Volume 7 , Issue 2 (April 2006)
table of contents
Pages: 302 - 330
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1529-3785
|
|
Author
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 56, Citation Count: 4
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In the same sense as classical logic is a formal theory of truth, the recently initiated approach called computability logic is a formal theory of computability. It understands (interactive) computational problems as games played by a machine against the environment, their computability as existence of a machine that always wins the game, logical operators as operations on computational problems, and validity of a logical formula as being a scheme of “always computabl ” problems. Computability logic has been introduced semantically, and now among its main technical goals is to axiomatize the set of valid formulas or various natural fragments of that set. The present contribution signifies a first step towards this goal. It gives a detailed exposition of a soundness and completeness proof for the rather new type of a deductive propositional system CL1, the logical vocabulary of which contains operators for the so called parallel and choice operations, and the atoms of which represent elementary problems, that is, predicates in the standard sense.This article is self-contained as it explains all relevant concepts. While not technically necessary, familiarity with the foundational paper “Introduction to Computability Logi ” [Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 123 (2003), pp.1-99] would greatly help the reader in understanding the philosophy, underlying motivations, potential and utility of computability logic---the context that determines the value of the present results.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
van Benthem, J. 2001. Logic in games. Tech. rep., University of Amsterdam. ILLC preprint.
|
| |
3
|
Blass, A. 1992. A game semantics for linear logic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 56, 183--220.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Japaridze, G. 1997. A constructive game semantics for the language of linear logic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 85, 87--156.
|
| |
6
|
Japaridze, G. 2002. The logic of tasks. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 117, 263--295.
|
| |
7
|
Japaridze, G. 2003. Introduction to computability logic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 123, 1--99.
|
| |
8
|
Japaridze, G. 2004. Computability logic: A formal theory of interaction. Tech. Rep. arXiv:cs.LO/0404024, Villanova University. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0404024.
|
| |
9
|
Lorenzen, P. 1961. Ein dialogishes Konstruktivitätskriterium. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Mathematics. PWN, (Warsaw) 193--200.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Turing, A. 1936. On computable numbers with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. In Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2:42, 230--265.
|
| |
12
|
|
|