The interpretation and utility of three cohesion metrics for object-oriented design

ABSTRACT

The concept of cohesion in a class has been the subject of various recent empirical studies and has been measured using many different metrics. In the structured programming paradigm, the software engineering community has adopted an informal yet meaningful and understandable definition of cohesion based on the work of Yourdon and Constantine. The object-oriented (OO) paradigm has formalised various cohesion measures, but the argument over the most meaningful of those metrics continues to be debated. Yet achieving highly cohesive software is fundamental to its comprehension and thus its maintainability. In this article we subject two object-oriented cohesion metrics, CAMC and NHD, to a rigorous mathematical analysis in order to better understand and interpret them. This analysis enables us to offer substantial arguments for preferring the NHD metric to CAMC as a measure of cohesion. Furthermore, we provide a complete understanding of the behaviour of these metrics, enabling us to attach a meaning to the values calculated by the CAMC and NHD metrics. In addition, we introduce a variant of the NHD metric and demonstrate that it has several advantages over CAMC and NHD. While it may be true that a generally accepted formal and informal definition of cohesion continues to elude the OO software engineering community, there seems considerable value in being able to compare, contrast, and interpret metrics which attempt to measure the same features of software.

REFERENCES

• 1: Edward B. Allen , Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Measuring Coupling and Cohesion: An Information-Theory Approach, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Software Metrics, p.119, November 04-06, 1999
• 2: Jagdish Bansiya , Carl G. Davis, A Hierarchical Model for Object-Oriented Design Quality Assessment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.28 n.1, p.4-17, January 2002 [doi>10.1109/32.979986 ]
• 3: Bansiya, J., Etzkorn, L., Davis, C., and Li, W. 1999. A class cohesion metric for object-oriented designs. J. Object-Oriented Program. 11, 8, 47--52.
• 4: Victor R. Basili , Lionel C. Briand , Walcélio L. Melo, A Validation of Object-Oriented Design Metrics as Quality Indicators, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.22 n.10, p.751-761, October 1996 [doi>10.1109/32.544352 ]
• 5: James M. Bieman , Byung-Kyoo Kang, Cohesion and reuse in an object-oriented system, Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Software reusability, p.259-262, April 29-30, 1995, Seattle, Washington, United States
• 6: J. M. Bieman , L. M. Ott, Measuring Functional Cohesion, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.20 n.8, p.644-657, August 1994 [doi>10.1109/32.310673 ]
• 7: David Binkley , L. Ross Raszewski , Christopher Smith , Mark Harman, An Empirical Study of Amorphous Slicing as a Program Comprehension Support Tool, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, p.161, June 10-11, 2000
• 8: Lionel C. Briand , John W. Daly , Jürgen Wüst, A Unified Framework for Cohesion Measurement in Object-OrientedSystems, Empirical Software Engineering, v.3 n.1, p.65-117, 1998 [doi>10.1023/A:1009783721306 ]
• 9: Lionel C. Briand , Sandro Morasca , Victor R. Basili, Property-Based Software Engineering Measurement, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.22 n.1, p.68-86, January 1996 [doi>10.1109/32.481535 ]
• 10: Lionel C. Briand , Sandro Morasca , Victor R. Basili, Defining and Validating Measures for Object-Based High-Level Design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.25 n.5, p.722-743, September 1999 [doi>10.1109/32.815329 ]
• 11: Shyam R. Chidamber , Chris F. Kemerer, Towards a metrics suite for object oriented design, Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, p.197-211, October 06-11, 1991, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
• 12: S. R. Chidamber , C. F. Kemerer, A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.20 n.6, p.476-493, June 1994 [doi>10.1109/32.295895 ]
• 13: Counsell, S., Mendes, E., Swift, S., and Tucker, A. 2001. An empirical investigation of fault seeding in requirements document. In Proceedings of the Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering EASE'01 (Keele, UK).
• 14: Counsell, S., Mendes, E., Swift, S., and Tucker, A. 2002. Evaluation of an object-oriented cohesion metric through Hamming distances. Tech. Rep. BBKCS-02-10, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK.
• 15: Counsell, S., Newson, P., and Mendes, E. 2004. Design level hypothesis testing through reverse engineering of object-oriented software. Int. J. Soft. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 14, 2, 207--220.
• 16: Norman Fenton , Shari Lawrence Pfleeger, Software metrics (2nd ed.): a rigorous and practical approach, PWS Publishing Co., Boston, MA, 1997
• 17: Henderson-Sellers, B., Constantine, L., and Graham, I. 1996. Coupling and cohesion (towards a valid metrics suite for object-oriented analysis and design). Object Oriented Syst. 3, 3, 143--158.
• 18: Hitz, M. and Montazeri, B. 1995. Measuring coupling and cohesion in object-oriented systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Applied Corporate Computing ISACC'95 (Monterrey, Mexico).
• 19: Stefan Kramer , Hermann Kaindl, Coupling and cohesion metrics for knowledge-based systems using frames and rules, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.13 n.3, p.332-358, July 2004 [doi>10.1145/1027092.1027094]
• 20: Arun Lakhotia, Rule-based approach to computing module cohesion, Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, p.35-44, May 17-21, 1993, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
• 21: Li, W. and Henry, S. 1993. Maintenance metrics for the object-oriented paradigm. In Proceedings of the 1st International Software Metrics Symposium (Baltimore, Md.), 52--60.
• 22: Mitchell, A. and Power, J. 2004. Run-time cohesion metrics: An empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (Las Vegas, Nev.), 9--14.
• 23: Snedecor, G. and Cochran, W. 1989. Statistical Methods, 8th ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
• 24: Stevens, W., Myers, G., and Constantine, L. 1974. Structured design. IBM Syst. J. 13, 2, 115--139.
• 25: Yourdon, E. and Constantine, L. 1979. Structured Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.8 Metrics

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: Object-oriented design methods

General Terms:
Measurement, Theory

Keywords:
Cohesion