ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Hardness of cut problems in directed graphs
Full text PdfPdf (296 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Session 13A table of contents
Pages: 527 - 536  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-134-1
Authors
Julia Chuzhoy  CSAIL MIT and University of Pennsylvania
Sanjeev Khanna  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1132516.1132593
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study the approximability of the multicut and the (non-bipartite) sparsest cut problems in directed graphs. In the multicut problem, we are a given a graph G along with k source-sink pairs, and the goal is to find a smallest subset of edges whose deletion separates all source-sink pairs. The sparsest cut problem has the same input, but the goal is to find a subset of edges to delete so as to minimize the ratio of deleted edges to the number of source-sink pairs that are separated by this deletion. Study of algorithms for cut problems is intimately connected to the dual notion of flows in networks, and many approximation algorithms for cut problems use a flow solution as a starting point. The best known approximation algorithm for directed multicut is based on this approach and gives an O(√n)-approximation. On the other hand, the gap between the maximum multicommodity flow and the minimum multicut is known to be Ω(min(k , log n)). While this flow-cut gap may be interpreted as an evidence of inherent difficulty in designing good approximation algorithms for directed multicut, the strongest hardness result known is an APX-hardness. Even assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, only an ω(1)-hardness is known. Similar bounds hold for the directed sparsest cut problem.Our main result is that directed multicut is Ω(log n / log log n)-hard to approximate unless NP ⊆ DTIME (npolylog n). We show that this hardness result holds even when we allow a bicriteria relaxation, where the approximate solution is required to separate only a constant fraction of the pairs. This bicriteria hardness allows us to infer an Ω(log n / log log n)-hardness for the directed (non-bipartite) sparsest cut problem.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
4
5
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
U. Feige and S. Kogan. Hardness of Approximation of the Balanced Complete Bipartite Subgraph Problem. Technical Report MCS04-04, Department of Computer Science and Applied Math., The Weizmann Institute of Science, 2004.
 
12
L. R. Ford, D. R. Fulkerson, 1962. Flows in Networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
19
 
20
 
21


Collaborative Colleagues:
Julia Chuzhoy: colleagues
Sanjeev Khanna: colleagues