skip to main content
10.1145/1134285.1134441acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Using the balanced scorecard process to compute the value of software applications

Published: 28 May 2006 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes a method that will provide practical help for IT managers and other enterprise executives who want to determine the value of their software projects. A set of measures is described that can help the IT manager determine the value of IT projects, either at the time a project is initiated or at the time the project is operational. This paper identifies relevant performance measures used in the balanced scorecard process and then maps them to IT benefits: which are categorized by strategic, informational, and transactional dimensions. The appropriate measure can be identified and value quantified based upon the expected IT benefit.

References

[1]
Aldag, R.J. and Power, D.J. "An empirical assessment of computer-assisted decision analysis," Decision Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 572--588, Fall 1986.
[2]
Brynjolfsson, E. "The productivity paradox of information technology," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 67--77, December 1993.
[3]
Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. "Lost? firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending," Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 541--558, April 1996.
[4]
Counihan, A., Finnegan, P., and Sammon, D. "Towards a framework for evaluating investments in data warehousing," Information Systems Journal, 12, pp. 321--338, 2002.
[5]
Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., and Kraemer, K.L. "Information technology and economic performance: a critical review of the empirical evidence," ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1--28, March 2003.
[6]
Fuerst W.L. and Cheney, P.H. "Factors affecting the perceived utilization of computer-based decision support systems in the oil industry," Decision Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 554--569, October 1982.
[7]
Grabowski, M. and Sanborn, S.D. "Evaluation of embedded intelligent real-time systems," Decision Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 95--123, Winter 2001.
[8]
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
[9]
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 2001.
[10]
King, J.L. and Schrems, E.L. "Cost-benefit analysis in information systems development and operation," ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 19--34, March 1978.
[11]
Mirani, R. and Lederer, A.L. "An instrument for assessing the organizational benefits of IS projects," Decision Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 803--838, Fall 1998.
[12]
Murphy, K.E. and Simon, S.J. "Intangible benefits valuation in ERP projects," Information Systems Journal, 12, pp. 301--320, 2002.
[13]
Mukhopadhyay, T., Rajiv, S. and Srinivasan, K. "Information technology impact on process output and quality," Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 12, pp. 1645--1659, December 1997.
[14]
Niven, P.R. Balanced Scorecard Step-By-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002.
[15]
Niven, P.R. Balanced Scorecard Step-By-Step: for Government and Nonprofit Agencies. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003.
[16]
Sethi, V. and King, W.R. "Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage," Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 1601--1627, December 1994.
[17]
Sharda, R., Barr, S.H., and McDonnell, J.C. "Decision support system effectiveness: a review and an empirical test," Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 139--159, February 1988.

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Customer knowledge management and the strategies of social softwareBusiness Process Management Journal10.1108/1463715111110559917:1(82-106)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2011

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE '06: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering
May 2006
1110 pages
ISBN:1595933751
DOI:10.1145/1134285
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 May 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. balanced scorecard
  2. return on investment

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ICSE06
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Customer knowledge management and the strategies of social softwareBusiness Process Management Journal10.1108/1463715111110559917:1(82-106)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2011

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media