ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scouts, promoters, and connectors: the roles of ratings in nearest neighbor collaborative filtering
Full text PdfPdf (278 KB)
Source Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Pages: 250 - 259  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-236-4
Authors
Bharath Kumar Mohan  Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
Benjamin J. Keller  Eastern Michigan University,Ypsilanti, MI, USA
Naren Ramakrishnan  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1134707.1134735
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems aggregate individual user ratings into predictions of products or services that might interest visitors. The quality of this aggregation process crucially affects the user experience and hence the effectiveness of recommenders in e-commerce. We present a novel study that disaggregates global recommender performance metrics into contributions made by each individual rating, allowing us to characterize the many roles played by ratings in nearest neighbor collaborative filtering. In particular, we formulate three roles--scouts, promoters, and connectors--that capture how users receive recommendations, how items get recommended, and how ratings of these two types are themselves connected (resp.). These roles find direct uses in improving recommendations for users, in better targeting of items and, most importantly, in helping monitor the health of the system as a whole. For instance, they can be used to track the evolution of neighborhoods, to identify rating subspaces that do not contribute (or contribute negatively) to system performance, to enumerate users who are in danger of leaving, and to assess the susceptibility of the system to attacks such as shilling. We argue that the three rating roles presented here provide broad primitives to manage a recommender system and its community.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Cosley, D., Lam, S., Albert, I., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. Is Seeing Believing?: How Recommender System Interfaces Affect User's Opinions. In Proc. CHI (2001), pp. 585--592.
2
3
 
4
Konstan, J. A. Personal communication. 2003.
5
 
6
7
8
9
 
10
Rashid, A. M., Karypis, G., and Riedl, J. Influence in Ratings-Based Recommender Systems: An Algorithm-Independent Approach. In Proc. of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (2005).
11
12
13


Collaborative Colleagues:
Bharath Kumar Mohan: colleagues
Benjamin J. Keller: colleagues
Naren Ramakrishnan: colleagues