|
ABSTRACT
Increases in online search activities have spurred the growth of search-based advertising services offered by search engines. These services enable companies to promote their products to consumers based on their search queries. In most search-based advertising services, a company sets a daily budget, selects a set of keywords, determines a bid price for each keyword, and designates an ad associated with each selected keyword. When a consumer searches for one of the selected keywords, search engines then display the ads associated with the highest bids for that keyword on the search result page. A company whose ad is displayed pays the search engine only when the consumer clicks on the ad. If the company's spending has exceeded its daily budget, however, its ads will not be displayed. With millions of available keywords and a highly uncertain clickthru rate associated with the ad for each keyword, identifying the most profitable set of keywords given the daily budget constraint becomes challenging for companies wishing to promote their goods and services via search-based advertising. Motivated by these challenges, we formulate a model of keyword selection in search-based advertising services. We develop an algorithm that adaptively identifies the set of keywords to bid on based on historical performance. The algorithm prioritizes keywords based on a prefix ordering-- sorting of keywords in a descending order of profit-tocost ratio (or "bang-per-buck"). We show that the average expected profit generated by the algorithm converges to near-optimal profits. Furthermore, the convergence rate is independent of the number of keywords and scales gracefully with the problem's parameters. Extensive numerical simulations show that our algorithm outperforms existing methods, increasing profits by about 7%.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
G. Aggarwal and J. D. Hartline, "Knapsack Auctions," Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, EC 2005.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
P. Auer, N. Cesa-Bianchi, Y. Freund, R. E. Schapire, "Gambling in a rigged casino: The adversarial multi-armed bandit problem," SODA 1995.
|
| |
5
|
M-F. Balcan, A. Blum, J. D. Hartline, Y. Mansour "Sponsored Search Auction Design via Machine Learning," Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, EC 2005.
|
| |
6
|
J. Chen, D. Liu, A. B. Whinston, "Designing Share Structure in Auctions of Divisible Goods," Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, EC 2005.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
J. Goodman, "Pay-Per-Percentage of Impressions: An Advertising Method that is Highly Robust to Fraud," Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, EC 2005.
|
| |
10
|
R.L. Graham, E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, "Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey," Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5:287--326, 1979.
|
| |
11
|
B. J. Jansen and M. Resnick, "Examining Searcher Perceptions of and Interactions with Sponsored Results," Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, EC 2005.
|
| |
12
|
B. Kitts, P. Laxminarayan, B. LeBlanc, R. Meech, "A Formal Analysis of Search Auctions Including Predictions on Click Fraud and Bidding Tactics," Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, EC 2005.
|
| |
13
|
R. Kleinberg, "Online Decision Problems with Large Strategy Sets," Ph.D. disseration, MIT 2005.
|
| |
14
|
R. Kleinberg, "Nearly tight bounds for the continuum-armed bandit problem," in NIPS 2005.
|
| |
15
|
S. R. Kulkarni and G. Lugosi, "Finite-time lower bounds for the two-armed bandit problem," IEEE Trans. Aut. Control, pp. 711--714, 2000.
|
| |
16
|
T. L. Lai and H. Robbins, "Asymptotically efficient adaptive allocation rules," Advances in Applied Mathematics, vol. 6, pp. 4--22, 1985.
|
| |
17
|
S. Mannor and J. N. Tsitsiklis, "Lower bounds on the sample complexity of exploration in the multiarmed bandit problem," Sixteenth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 418-432. Springer, 2003.
|
| |
18
|
C. Meek, D. M. Chickering, D. B. Wilson, "Stochastic and Contingent-Payment Auctions," Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, EC 2005.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
D. C. Parkes and T. Sandholm,"Optimize-and-Dispatch Architecture for Expressive Ad Auctions," Workshop on Sponsored Search, EC 2005.
|
| |
22
|
D. Pollard, Convergence of Stochastic Processes, Springer Verlang, 1994.
|
 |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
M. Zinkevich, "Online convex programming and generalized infinitisimal gradient ascent," in Proceeding of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 928--936, 2003.
|
CITED BY 5
|
Jon Feldman , S Muthukrishnan , Martin Pal , Cliff Stein, Budget optimization in search-based advertising auctions, Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, June 11-15, 2007, San Diego, California, USA
|
|
Christian Borgs , Jennifer Chayes , Nicole Immorlica , Kamal Jain , Omid Etesami , Mohammad Mahdian, Dynamics of bid optimization in online advertisement auctions, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, May 08-12, 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|