ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Topical TrustRank: using topicality to combat web spam
Full text PdfPdf (285 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Edinburgh, Scotland
SESSION: Fighting search spam table of contents
Pages: 63 - 72  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-323-9
Authors
Baoning Wu  Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA
Vinay Goel  Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA
Brian D. Davison  Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 114,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1135777.1135792
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Web spam is behavior that attempts to deceive search engine ranking algorithms. TrustRank is a recent algorithm that can combat web spam. However, TrustRank is vulnerable in the sense that the seed set used by TrustRank may not be sufficiently representative to cover well the different topics on the Web. Also, for a given seed set, TrustRank has a bias towards larger communities. We propose the use of topical information to partition the seed set and calculate trust scores for each topic separately to address the above issues. A combination of these trust scores for a page is used to determine its ranking. Experimental results on two large datasets show that our Topical TrustRank has a better performance than TrustRank in demoting spam sites or pages. Compared to TrustRank, our best technique can decrease spam from the top ranked sites by as much as 43.1%.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Acharya, M. Cutts, J. Dean, P. Haahr, M. Henzinger, U. Hoelzle, S. Lawrence, K. Peger, O. Sercinoglu, and S. Tong. Information retrieval based on historical data, Mar. 31 2005. US Patent Application number 20050071741.
 
2
A. A. Benczur, K. Csalogany, T. Sarlos, and M. Uher. SpamRank - fully automatic link spam detection. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), 2005.
3
 
4
5
 
6
G. Collins. Latest search engine spam techniques, Aug. 2004. Online at http://www.sitepoint.com/article/search-enginespam-techniques.
7
 
8
I. Drost and T. Scheer. Thwarting the nigritude ultramarine: Learning to identify link spam. In Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 96--107, Oct. 2005.
9
10
11
 
12
Z. Gyöngyi and H. Garcia-Molina. Web spam taxonomy. In First International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), Chiba, Japan, 2005.
 
13
Z. Gyöngyi, H. Garcia-Molina, and J. Pedersen. Combating web spam with TrustRank. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), pages 271--279, Toronto, Canada, Sept. 2004.
14
15
16
 
17
 
18
Internet Archive, 2005. http://www.archive.org/.
19
 
20
G. Mishne, D. Carmel, and R. Lempel. Blocking blog spam with language model disagreement. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), 2005.
 
21
Open Directory Project, 2005. http://dmoz.org/.
 
22
Open Directory RDF Dump, 2005. http://rdf.dmoz.org/.
 
23
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
 
24
A. Perkins. White paper: The classication of search engine spam, Sept. 2001. Online at http://www.silverdisc.co.uk/articles/spamclassication/.
 
25
Räber Information Management GmbH. The Swiss search engine, 2005. http://www.search.ch/.
26
 
27
B. Wu and B. D. Davison. Cloaking and redirection: A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), May 2005.
28

CITED BY  9
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Baoning Wu: colleagues
Vinay Goel: colleagues
Brian D. Davison: colleagues