ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Examining the content and privacy of web browsing incidental information
Full text PdfPdf (246 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Edinburgh, Scotland
SESSION: Browsers table of contents
Pages: 123 - 132  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-323-9
Authors
Kirstie Hawkey  Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Kori M. Inkpen  Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 123,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1135777.1135801
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This research examines the privacy comfort levels of participants if others can view traces of their web browsing activity. During a week-long field study, participants used an electronic diary daily to annotate each web page visited with a privacy level. Content categories were used by participants to theoretically specify their privacy comfort for each category and by researchers to partition participants' actual browsing. The content categories were clustered into groups based on the dominant privacy levels applied to the pages. Inconsistencies between participants in their privacy ratings of categories suggest that a general privacy management scheme is inappropriate. Participants' consistency within categories suggests that a personalized scheme may be feasible; however a more fine-grained approach to classification is required to improve results for sites that tend to be general, of multiple task purposes, or dynamic in content.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Cerberian Web Filter Categories. www.webrootdisp.net/ audit/rating-descriptions.htm.
 
2
Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) Project. http:// www.w3.org/P3P/.
 
3
WebRoot Software | Window Washer. http://www. webroot.com/consumer/products/windowwasher/.
 
4
Yahoo! Directory. http://dir.yahoo.com.
 
5
ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite Datasheet. http://down load.zonelabs.com/bin/media/pdf/zaiss60_datasheet.pdf.
6
7
8
 
9
Cadiz, J. and Gupta, A. (2001). Privacy Interfaces for Collaboration. Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA. Technical Report No. MSR-TR-2001-82.
 
10
 
11
Consumer Reports (2005) Filtering software: Better, but still fallible. http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electron ics-computers/internet-filtering-software-605/overview.htm.
 
12
Cothey, V. (2002). A Longitudinal Study of World Wide Web Users' Information-Searching Behavior.
 
13
Curry, A. (2002). What are Public Library Users Viewing on the Internet?: An Analysis of the Transaction Logs of Burnaby, Brantford, Calgary, Winnipeg, and Halifax Public Libraries, National Library and Archives Canada Virtual Collection of Monographs and Periodicals, http://tiny url.com/8v7qc.
 
14
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York, Doubleday Anchor Books.
15
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
Kaasten, S., Greenberg, S. and Edwards, C. (2002). How People Recognize Previously Seen WWW Pages from Titles, URLs and Thumbnails. In Proc. of Human Computer Interaction 2002, 247--265.
 
20
21
 
22
Lederer, S., Mankoff, J. and Dey, A. K. (2003). Towards a Deconstruction of the Privacy Space. Workshop on Ubicomp Communities: Privacy as Boundary Negotiation, UBICOMP 2003, http://guir.berkeley.edu/pubs/ubicomp 2003/privacyworkshop/papers/lederer-privacyspace.pdf
 
23
Nie, N. H. and Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report, Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/ Press _Release/Preliminary_Report.pdf.
24
25
26
27
28


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kirstie Hawkey: colleagues
Kori M. Inkpen: colleagues