ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis of communication models in web service compositions
Full text PdfPdf (318 KB)
Source International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Edinburgh, Scotland
SESSION: Correctness & security table of contents
Pages: 267 - 276  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-323-9
Authors
Raman Kazhamiakin  DIT, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Marco Pistore  DIT, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Luca Santuari  DIT, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 169,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1135777.1135819
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe an approach for the verification of Web service compositions defined by sets of BPEL processes. The key aspect of such a verification is the model adopted for representing the communications among the services participating in the composition. Indeed, these communications are asynchronous and buffered in the existing execution frameworks, while most verification approaches assume a synchronous communication model for efficiency reasons. In our approach, we develop a parametric model for describing Web service compositions, which allows us to capture a hierarchy of communication models, ranging from synchronous communications to asynchronous communications with complex buffer structures. Moreover, we develop a technique to associate with a Web service composition the most adequate communication model, i.e., the simplest model that is sufficient to capture all the behaviors of the composition. This way, we can provide an accurate model of a wider class of service composition scenarios, while preserving as much as possible an efficient performance in verification.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
T. Andrews, F. Curbera, H. Dolakia, J. Goland, J. Klein, F. Leymann, K. Liu, D. Roller, D. Smith, S. Thatte, I. Trickovic, and S. Weeravarana. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (version 1.1), 2003.
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
H. Foster, S. Uchitel, J. Magee, and J. Kramer. Model-based verification of Web Service Compositions. In Proc. ASE'03, 2003.
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
R. M. Karp and R. E. Miller. Parallel program schemata. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 3(2):147--195, 1969.
 
11
R. Kazhamiakin and M. Pistore. A Parametric Communication Model for the Verification of BPEL4WS Compositions. In Proc. WS-FM'05, 2005.
 
12
R. Khalaf, N. Mukhi, and S. Weeravarana. Service Oriented Composition in BPEL4WS. In Proc. WWW2004, 2004.
 
13
J. Koehler and B. Srivastava. Web service composition: Current solutions and open problems. In Proc. of ICAPS'03 Workshop on Planning for Web Services, 2002.
 
14
S. Nakajima. Model-checking verification for reliable web service. In Proc. OOPSLA'02 Workshop on OOWS, 2002.
15
 
16
 
17
M. Pistore, M. Roveri, and P. Busetta. Requirements-Driven Verification of Web Services. In Proc. WS-FM'04, 2004.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Raman Kazhamiakin: colleagues
Marco Pistore: colleagues
Luca Santuari: colleagues