ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Minimum weight triangulation is NP-hard
Full text PdfPdf (886 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the twenty-second annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Sedona, Arizona, USA
SESSION: Session 1 (monday, june 5th--9:10-10:30 am) table of contents
Pages: 1 - 10  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-340-9
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 80,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137856.1137859
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A triangulation of a planar point set S is a maximal plane straight-line graph with vertex set S. In the minimum weight triangulation (MWT) problem, we are looking for a triangulation of a given point set that minimizes the sum of the edge lengths. We prove that the decision version of this problem is NP-hard. We use a reduction from PLANAR-1-IN-3-SAT. The correct working of the gadgets is established with computer assistance, using geometric inclusion and exclusion criteria for MWT edges, such as the diamond test and the LMT-Skeleton heuristic, as well as dynamic programming on polygonal faces.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
[6] S. W. Cheng, M. J. Golin, and J. C. F. Tsang. Expected case analysis of ß-skeletons with applications to the construction of minimum weight triangulations. Proceedings of the 8th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, Ottawa, pp. 279-284, 1996.
 
7
8
 
9
 
10
[10] M. T. Dickerson, J. M. Keil, and M. H. Montague. A large subgraph of the minimum weight triangulation. Discrete and Computational Geometry 18 (1997), 289-304.
 
11
 
12
[12] R. L. Drysdale, G. Rote, and O. Aichholzer. A simple linear time greedy triangulation algorithm for uniformly distributed points. IIG-Report-Series 408, Technische Universität Graz, 1995.
 
13
[13] R. D. Duppe and H. J. Gottschalk. Automatische Interpolation von Isolinien bei willkürlichen Stützpunkten. Allgemeine Vermessungsnachrichten 77 (1970), 423-426.
 
14
 
15
[15] P. D. Gilbert. New results in planar triangulations. Report R-850, Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 1979.
 
16
[16] R. Hainz, O. Aichholzer, and F. Aurenhammer. New results on minimum weight triangulations and the LMT-skeleton. Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Computational Geometry, Würzburg, Germany, pp. 4-6, 1997.
 
17
[17] M. Hoffmann and Y. Okamoto. The minimum weight triangulation problem with few interior points. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Parameterized and Exact Computation, Bergen, Norway, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 3162, pp. 200-212, 2004.
18
 
19
 
20
[20] G. T. Klincsek. Minimal triangulations of polygonal domains. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, volume 9, 1980, pp. 121-123.
 
21
 
22
[22] D. Lichtenstein. Planar formulae and their uses. SIAM J. Computing 11 (1982), 329-343.
 
23
[23] D. G. Kirkpatrick. A note on Delaunay and optimal triangulations. Information Processing Letters 10 (1980), 127-128.
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
[27] E. L. Lloyd. On triangulations of a set of points in the plane. Proceedings of the 18th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 228-240, 1977.
 
28
[28] G. K. Manacher and A. L. Zobrist. Neither the greedy nor the the Delaunay triangulation approximates the optimum. Information Processing Letters 9 (1979), 31-34.
 
29
30
31
 
32
[32] M. I. Shamos and D. Hoey. Closest point problems. Proceedings of the 16th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Berkeley, California, pp. 151-162, 1975.
 
33