ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On realistic terrains
Full text PdfPdf (261 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the twenty-second annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Sedona, Arizona, USA
SESSION: Session 6 (tuesday, june 6th--10:45 am-12:00 pm) table of contents
Pages: 177 - 186  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-340-9
Authors
Esther Moet  Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Marc van Kreveld  Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
A. Frank van der Stappen  Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137856.1137885
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study worst-case complexities of visibility and distance structures on terrains under realistic assumptions on edge length ratios and the angles of the triangles. We show that the visibility map of a point for a realistic terrain with n triangles has complexity Θ(nn). We also prove that the shortest path between two points p and q on a realistic terrain passes through Θ(√n) triangles, and that the bisector between p and q has complexity O(n √n). We use these results to show that the shortest path map for any point on a realistic terrain has complexity Θ(n√n), and that the Voronoi diagram for any set of m points on a realistic terrain has complexity Ω(n + m√n) and O((n+m)√n). Our results immediately imply more efficient algorithms for computing the various structures on realistic terrains.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. Alt, R. Fleischer, M. Kaufmann, K. Mehlhorn, S. Näher, S. Schirra, and C. Uhrig. Approximate motion planning and the complexity of the boundary of the union of simple geometric figures. Algorithmica, 8:391--406, 1992.
2
 
3
 
4
J. Chen and Y. Han. Shortest paths on a polyhedron. Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl., 6(2):127--144, 1996.
 
5
M. de Berg. Linear size binary space partitions for uncluttered scenes. Algorithmica, 28:353--366, 2000.
6
 
7
 
8
M. de Berg, M. J. Katz, A. F. van der Stappen, and J. Vleugels. Realistic input models for geometric algorithms. Algorithmica, 34:81--97, 2002.
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
J. S. B. Mitchell, D. M. Mount, and S. Suri. Query-sensitive ray shooting. Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl., 7(4):317--347, Aug. 1997.
 
17
 
18
 
19
A. F. van der Stappen, M. H. Overmars, M. de Berg, and J. Vleugels. Motion planning in environments with low obstacle density. Discrete Comput. Geom., 20(4):561--587, 1998.
 
20
 
21
J. Vleugels. On Fatness and Fitness—Realistic Input Models for Geometric Algorithms. Ph.{D. thesis, Dept. Comput. Sci., Univ. Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1997.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Esther Moet: colleagues
Marc van Kreveld: colleagues
A. Frank van der Stappen: colleagues