ABSTRACT
Nearly 50 years of empirical research has suggested that social influences have an inhibiting effect on creativity in collaborating groups such as design teams. This suggests that design teams may not be as creative as they could be, resulting in a negative impact on the design process. In this paper we investigate the effect of group composition on creativity in terms of divergent thinking, in order to determine how best to support the creative process in design and the development of design environments. We present some novel results about 'group think', showing that real groups foster refinement of ideas while nominal groups foster duplication of ideas.
- Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c. 48), 1988Google Scholar
- Amabile, T.M. The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benami, O., Yan, J., Creative Stimulation in Conceptual Design. Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference, (2002), 1--13Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K Contextual Design. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco, California, 1998Google Scholar
- Boden, M. The Dimensions of Creativity. MIT Press Cambridge, London, 1994Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bonnardel, N. Creativity in design activities: The role of analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. Proc. Creativity and Cognition, (1999), 158--165 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruseberg, A., McDonagh-Philp, D. New Product Development by Eliciting User Experience and Aspirations. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, (2001), 435--452 Google ScholarDigital Library
- de Bono, E. The Use of Laterial Thinking. Jonathon Cape, London, 1967Google Scholar
- Demhis, A.R., Valacich, J. S. Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better Than One. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 4 (1993), 531--536Google Scholar
- Diehl, M., Stroebe, W. Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, (1987), 497--509Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fischer, G. Domain-Oriented Design Environments: Supporting Individual and Social Creativity. Computational Models of Creative Design IV (1999), 83--111Google Scholar
- Gennari, J.H., Reddy, M., Participatory Design and an Eligibility Screen Tool. Proc. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, (2000), 290--294Google Scholar
- Gough, H.G. A Creative Personality Scale for the Adjective Check List. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 8 (1979), 1398--1405Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grudin, J. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers Communications of the ACM, (1994), 92--105 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guildford, J.P. Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, (1950), 444--454Google ScholarCross Ref
- Janis, I.L. Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin, 1982Google Scholar
- Johnson, P., Johnson, H., Wilson, S,. Rapid Prototyping of User Interfaces Driven by Task Models. in Carroll, J. ed. Scenario-Based Design, John Wiley (1995) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiesler, S., Barley, S. R., Kraut, R. E., Dutton, W. H., Resnick, P., Yates, J., Does CSCW Need Organization Theory? Proc. CSCW, (2004), ACM Press, 122--124 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koestler, A. The act of creation. Dell, New York, 1964Google Scholar
- Lamm, H., Trommsdorff, G. Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming). European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, (1973), 361--387Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lawson, B. How Designers Think. Eastview Editions, USA, 1980Google Scholar
- Mullen, B., Johnson, C., Salas, E. Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: A Meta-Analytic Integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 1 (1991), 3--23Google ScholarCross Ref
- O'Neill, E. User-developer cooperation in software development: building common ground and usable systems. Springer Verlag, London, 2000 Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Neill, E., Johnson, P., Johnson, H. Representation and user-developer interaction in cooperative analysis and design. Human Computer Interaction, 14, 1--2 (1999), 43--91 Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Neill, E., Woodgate, D., Kostakos, V., Easing the wait in the Emergency Room: building a theory of public information systems. Proc. DIS, (2004), ACM Press, 17--25 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. Scribeners and Sons, New York, 1957Google Scholar
- Paulus, P.B. Groups, Teams and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups. Applied Psychology, 49, (2000), 237--262Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paulus, P.B., Yang, H. Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organisations. Journal of Organisational Behaviour & Human Decision Processes, 82, 1 (2000), 76--87Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prante, T., Magerkurth, C. and Streitz, N., Developing CSCW Tools for Idea Finding - Empirical Results and Implications for Design. Proc. CSCW, (2002), 106--115 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rotter, G.S., Portugal, S. M. Group and Individual Effects in Problem Solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 4 (1969), 338--341Google ScholarCross Ref
- Streitz, N., Gei?ler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S., Müller-Tomfolde, C., Reischl, W., Rexroth, P., Seitz, P., & Steinmetz, R., I-LAND: An interactive Landscape for Creativity and Innovation. Proc. CHI, (1999), 120--127 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taylor, D.W., Berry, P. C., Block C. H. Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 1 (1958), 23--47Google ScholarCross Ref
- Terry, D.J., Hoog, M. A. Attributes, behaviour and social context the roles of norms and group membership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2000Google Scholar
- Torrance, E.P. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: norms-technical manual. Presonnel Press, Princeton, N.J., 1966Google Scholar
- Warr, A., O'Neill, E., Getting Creative with Participatory Design. Proc. Participatory Design Conference, (2004), 57-60 Warr, A., O'Neill, E., The Effect of Operational Mechanisms on Creativity. Proc. Interact, (2005), ACM Press, 629--642Google Scholar
- Warr, A., O'Neill, E., The Effect of Operational Mechanisms on Creativity. Proc. Interact, (2005), ACM Press, 629--642 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Warr, A., O'Neill, E., Understanding Design as a Social Creative Process. Proc. Creativity and Cognition, (2005), ACM Press, 118--127 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Warr, A., O'Neill, E., Public Social Private Design (PSPD). Extended Abstract of CHI, (2006), ACM Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- Warr, A., O'Neill, E., Tools for Creativity: Sketching with the EDC and PSPD. "Sketching" Nurturing Creativity: Commonalities in Art, Design, Engineering and Research , a workshop at CHI, (2006). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The effect of group composition on divergent thinking in an interaction design activity
Recommendations
How Digital Tools Impact Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Design Ideation
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDigital tools that support creative activities are ubiquitous in the design industry, yet practitioners appear to prefer pen and paper for design ideation. To better understand this exception, we conducted a comparative study between analog and digital ...
Creativity Support Tools and Convergent Thinking: A Preliminary Review on Idea Evaluation and Selection
C&C '23: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and CognitionCreativity Support Tools (CSTs) have grown exponentially in the HCI field. However, this growth has always leaned towards divergent thinking, thus neglecting convergent thinking. We confirm this information based on a preliminary review between 2012 and ...
Feasibility of online divergent thinking assessment
The project examined creative thinking in online settings.The goal was to aid creative thinking research by increasing ecological validity.Online administration had no detrimental affect on divergent thinking.Imposition of time limits effectively ...
Comments