ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Phrasing techniques for multi-stroke selection gestures
Full text PdfPdf (351 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 137 archive
Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2006 table of contents
Quebec, Canada
SESSION: Gesture and interaction table of contents
Pages: 147 - 154  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN ~ ISSN:0713-5424 , 1-56881-308-2
Authors
Ken Hinckley  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Francois Guimbretiere  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Maneesh Agrawala  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Georg Apitz  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Nicholas Chen  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Sponsor
CHCCS : The Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society
Publisher
Canadian Information Processing Society  Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 110,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   

ABSTRACT

Pen gesture interfaces have difficulty supporting arbitrary multiple-stroke selections because lifting the pen introduces ambiguity as to whether the next stroke should add to the existing selection, or begin a new one. We explore and evaluate techniques that use a non-preferred-hand button or touchpad to phrase together one or more independent pen strokes into a unitary multi-stroke gesture. We then illustrate how such phrasing techniques can support multiple-stroke selection gestures with tapping, crossing, lassoing, disjoint selection, circles of exclusion, selection decorations, and implicit grouping operations. These capabilities extend the expressiveness of pen gesture interfaces and suggest new directions for multiple-stroke pen input techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Appert, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Mackay, W. Context matters: Evaluating interaction techniques with the CIS model. Proc. HCI 2004, Springer Verlag, 279--295.
 
4
Buxton, W. An Informal Study of Selection-Positioning Tasks. Proceedings of Graphics Interface '82: 8th Conference of the Canadian Man-Computer Communications Society, 323--328.
 
5
Buxton, W. Chunking and Phrasing and the Design of Human-Computer Dialogues. Information Processing '86, Proc. IFIP 10th World Computer Congress, Amsterdam: North Holland, 475--480.
 
6
Buxton, W., Fiume, E., Hill, R., Lee, A., Woo, C. Continuous hand-gesture driven input. Proceedings of Graphics Interface'83, 191--195.
7
8
9
10
11
12
 
13
Kurtenbach, G., Sellen, A., Buxton, W., An emprical evaluation of some articulatory and cognitive aspects of 'marking menus'. J. Human Computer Interaction, 1993. 8(1).
14
15
16
 
17
Mackay, W. E. Which Interaction Technique Works When? Floating Palettes, Marking Menus and Toolglasses Support Different Task Strategies. Proc. AVI 2002 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, ACM, 203--208.
18
 
19
20
 
21
Pier, K., Landay, J. A., Issues for Location-Independent Interfaces. 1992: Technical Report ISTL92--4, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
22
23
 
24
 
25
Sellen, A., Kurtenbach, G., Buxton, W., The Prevention of Mode Errors through Sensory Feedback. J. Human Computer Interaction, 1992. 7(2): p. 141--164.
26


Collaborative Colleagues:
Ken Hinckley: colleagues
Francois Guimbretiere: colleagues
Maneesh Agrawala: colleagues
Georg Apitz: colleagues
Nicholas Chen: colleagues