ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Algorithms for portfolio management based on the Newton method
Full text PdfPdf (208 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 148 archive
Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Pages: 9 - 16  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-383-2
Authors
Amit Agarwal  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Elad Hazan  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Satyen Kale  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Robert E. Schapire  Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 85,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143844.1143846
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We experimentally study on-line investment algorithms first proposed by Agarwal and Hazan and extended by Hazan et al. which achieve almost the same wealth as the best constant-rebalanced portfolio determined in hindsight. These algorithms are the first to combine optimal logarithmic regret bounds with efficient deterministic computability. They are based on the Newton method for offline optimization which, unlike previous approaches, exploits second order information. After analyzing the algorithm using the potential function introduced by Agarwal and Hazan, we present extensive experiments on actual financial data. These experiments confirm the theoretical advantage of our algorithms, which yield higher returns and run considerably faster than previous algorithms with optimal regret. Additionally, we perform financial analysis using mean-variance calculations and the Sharpe ratio.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agarwal, A., & Hazan, E. (2005). New algorithms for repeated play and universal portfolio management. Princeton University Technical Report TR-740-05.
 
2
Algoet, P., & Cover, T. (1988). Asymptotic optimality and asymptotic equipartition properties of log-optimum investment. Annals of Probability, 2, 876--898.
 
3
Bell, R., & Cover, T. (1980). Competitive optimality of logarithmic investment. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2, 161--166.
 
4
 
5
 
6
Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R., & Gogan, V. (2004). Can we learn to beat the best stock. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 21, 579--594.
 
7
Brookes, M. (2005). The matrix reference manual. {online} www.ee.ic.ac.uk/hp/staff/dmb/matrix/intro.html.
 
8
Cover, T. (1991). Universal portfolios. Mathematical Finance, 1, 1--19.
 
9
Hannan, J. (1957). Approximation to bayes risk in repeated play. In M. Dresher, A. W. Tucker and P. Wolfe, editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games, III, 97--139.
 
10
Hazan, E., Kalai, A., Kale, S., & Agarwal, A. (2006). Logarithmic regret algorithms for online convex optimization. To appear in the 19th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT).
 
11
Helmbold, D., Schapire, R., Singer, Y., & Warmuth., M. (1998). On-line portfolio selection using multiplicative updates. Mathematical Finance, 8, 325--347.
 
12
 
13
 
14
Kelly, J. (1956). A new interpretation of information rate. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 917--926.
 
15
 
16
Lovász, L., & Vempala, S. (2003a). The geometry of logconcave functions and an O*(n3) sampling algorithm (Technical Report MSR-TR-2003-04). Microsoft Research.
 
17
 
18
Luenberger, D. G. (1998). Investment science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19
20
 
21

Collaborative Colleagues:
Amit Agarwal: colleagues
Elad Hazan: colleagues
Satyen Kale: colleagues
Robert E. Schapire: colleagues