ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Hidden process models
Full text PdfPdf (630 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 148 archive
Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Pages: 433 - 440  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-383-2
Authors
Rebecca A. Hutchinson  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Tom M. Mitchell  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Indrayana Rustandi  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143844.1143899
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We introduce Hidden Process Models (HPMs), a class of probabilistic models for multivariate time series data. The design of HPMs has been motivated by the challenges of modeling hidden cognitive processes in the brain, given functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data. fMRI data is sparse, high-dimensional, non-Markovian, and often involves prior knowledge of the form "hidden event A occurs n times within the interval [t,t′]." HPMs provide a generalization of the widely used General Linear Model approaches to fMRI analysis, and HPMs can also be viewed as a subclass of Dynamic Bayes Networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Boynton, G. M., Engel, S. A., Glover, G. H., & Heeger, D. J. (1996). Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4207--4221.
 
2
Dale, A. M. (1999). Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 109--114.
 
3
 
4
Højen-Sørensen, P., Hansen, L. K., & Rasmussen, C. E. (2000). Bayesian modelling of fMRI time series. Proc. Conf. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS (pp. 754--760).
 
5
Keller, T., Just, M., & Stenger, V. (2001). Reading span and the time-course of cortical activation in sentence-picture verification. Annual Convention of the Psychonomic Society.
 
6
 
7
Murphy, K. P. (2002). Dynamic bayesian networks. To appear in Probabilistic Graphical Models, M. Jordan.
 
8
Niculescu, R., & Mitchell, T. (2006). Bayesian network learning with parameter constraints. Journal of Machine Learning Research.
 
9
Zhang, L., Samaras, D., Alia-Klein, N., Volkow, N., & Goldstein, R. (2006). Modeling neuronal interactivity using dynamic bayesian networks. In Y. Weiss, B. Schöölkopf and J. Platt (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 18, 1595--1602. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rebecca A. Hutchinson: colleagues
Tom M. Mitchell: colleagues
Indrayana Rustandi: colleagues