ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Segmentation of medical images using a genetic algorithm
Full text PdfPdf (1.53 MB)
Source Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Seattle, Washington, USA
SESSION: Genetic algorithms: papers table of contents
Pages: 1171 - 1178  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-186-4
Authors
Payel Ghosh  Portland State University, Portland, OR
Melanie Mitchell  Portland State University, Portland, OR
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 283,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143997.1144183
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Segmentation of medical images is challenging due to poor image contrast and artifacts that result in missing or diffuse organ/tissue boundaries. Consequently, this task involves incorporating as much prior information as possible (e.g., texture, shape, and spatial location of organs) into a single framework. In this paper, we present a genetic algorithm for automating the segmentation of the prostate on two-dimensional slices of pelvic computed tomography (CT) images. In this approach the segmenting curve is represented using a level set function, which is evolved using a genetic algorithm (GA). Shape and textural priors derived from manually segmented images are used to constrain the evolution of the segmenting curve over successive generations.We review some of the existing medical image segmentation techniques. We also compare the results of our algorithm with those of a simple texture extraction algorithm (Laws' texture measures) as well as with another GA-based segmentation tool called GENIE. Our preliminary tests on a small population of segmenting contours show promise by converging on the prostate region. We expect that further improvements can be achieved by incorporating spatial relationships between anatomical landmarks, and extending the methodology to three dimensions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Cagnoni, A., Dobrzeniecki, A. B., Poli, R., and. Yanch, J. C. Genetic algorithm-based interactive segmentation of 3D medical images. Image and Vision Computing, 17(12), 881--895, 1999.
 
2
 
3
Chan, T., and Vese, L. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 10, 266--277, 2001.
 
4
 
5
 
6
Harris, C., and Buxton, B. Evolving edge detectors with genetic programming. In Koza, J. R., Goldberg, D. E., Fogel, D. B., and Riolo, R. L., editors, Genetic Programming 1996: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, pp. 309--315. MIT Press, 1996.
 
7
Harvey, N., Levenson, R. M., Rimm, D. L. Investigation of automated feature extraction techniques for applications in cancer detection from multi-spectral histopathology images. Proc. of SPIE 2003, 5032, 557--566.
 
8
 
9
Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. Snakes: Active contour models. Intl. J. Computer Vision, 1, 321--331, 1988.
 
10
Laws, K. I. Rapid texture identification. SPIE, Image Processing for Missile Guidance, 238, 376--380, 1980.
 
11
Laws, K. I. Texture Image Segmentation. PhD dissertation, Univ. of Southern Calif., Jan. 1980.
 
12
Leventon, M., Grimson, E., and Faugeras, O. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Patt. Recog., 1, 316--323, 2000.
 
13
 
14
 
15
Nordin, P., and Banzhaf, W. Programmatic compression of images and sound. In Genetic Programming 1996, Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, Koza J. R. et al. editors, pp. 345--350, MIT Press, 1996.
 
16
Perkins, S., Theiler, J., Brumby, S. P., Harvey, N. R., Porter, R. B., Szymanski, J. J., and Bloch. J. J. GENIE: A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Feature Classification in Multi-Spectral Images. Proc. SPIE 4120 Applications and Science of Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems, and Evolutionary Computation III, pp. 52--62, 2000.
 
17
Pham, D. L., Xu, C., Prince, J. L. Survey of current methods in medical image segmentation. Annual Review of Biomedical Eng., 2, pp. 315--337, 2000.
 
18
Poli, R., and Cagoni, S. Genetic programming with user-driven selection: Experiments on the evolution of algorithms for image enhancement. In Genetic Programming 1997, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference, J. R. Koza et al. editors, pp. 269--277, 1997.
 
19
Sonka, M., Hlavac, V., and Boyle, R. Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision. London, Chapman & Hall, UK, 1994.
 
20
Tsai, A., Yezzi, A., Wells, W., Tempany, C., Tucker, D., Fan, A., Grimson, E., Willsky A. A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 22,137--154, 2003.
 
21
Tsai, A., Wells, W., Warfield, S., Willsky, A. An EM algorithm for shape classification based on level sets. Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 5, 491--502, October 2005.
 
22

Collaborative Colleagues:
Payel Ghosh: colleagues
Melanie Mitchell: colleagues