skip to main content
10.1145/1143997.1144183acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Segmentation of medical images using a genetic algorithm

Published:08 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Segmentation of medical images is challenging due to poor image contrast and artifacts that result in missing or diffuse organ/tissue boundaries. Consequently, this task involves incorporating as much prior information as possible (e.g., texture, shape, and spatial location of organs) into a single framework. In this paper, we present a genetic algorithm for automating the segmentation of the prostate on two-dimensional slices of pelvic computed tomography (CT) images. In this approach the segmenting curve is represented using a level set function, which is evolved using a genetic algorithm (GA). Shape and textural priors derived from manually segmented images are used to constrain the evolution of the segmenting curve over successive generations.We review some of the existing medical image segmentation techniques. We also compare the results of our algorithm with those of a simple texture extraction algorithm (Laws' texture measures) as well as with another GA-based segmentation tool called GENIE. Our preliminary tests on a small population of segmenting contours show promise by converging on the prostate region. We expect that further improvements can be achieved by incorporating spatial relationships between anatomical landmarks, and extending the methodology to three dimensions.

References

  1. Cagnoni, A., Dobrzeniecki, A. B., Poli, R., and. Yanch, J. C. Genetic algorithm-based interactive segmentation of 3D medical images. Image and Vision Computing, 17(12), 881--895, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., and Shapiro, G. Geodesic active contours. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 22, 61--79, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chan, T., and Vese, L. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 10, 266--277, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cohen, L. On active contour models and balloons. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 53, 211--218, 1991.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Daida, J.M., Hommes, J. D., Bersano-Begey, T.F., Ross, S. J, and Vesecky, J. F. Algorithm discovery using the genetic programming paradigm: Extracting low-contrast curvilinear features from SAR images of Arctic ice. In Advances in Genetic Programming 2, P. J. Angeline, and K. E. Kinnear, Jr., editors, chap. 21, MIT, Cambridge, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Harris, C., and Buxton, B. Evolving edge detectors with genetic programming. In Koza, J. R., Goldberg, D. E., Fogel, D. B., and Riolo, R. L., editors, Genetic Programming 1996: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, pp. 309--315. MIT Press, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Harvey, N., Levenson, R. M., Rimm, D. L. Investigation of automated feature extraction techniques for applications in cancer detection from multi-spectral histopathology images. Proc. of SPIE 2003, 5032, 557--566.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey, N., Perkins, S., Brumby, S. P., Theiler, J., Porter, R. B., Young, A. C., Verghese, A. K., Szymanski J. J., and Bloch, J. J. Finding golf courses: The ultra high-tech approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1803, pp.54--64, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. Snakes: Active contour models. Intl. J. Computer Vision, 1, 321--331, 1988.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Laws, K. I. Rapid texture identification. SPIE, Image Processing for Missile Guidance, 238, 376--380, 1980.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Laws, K. I. Texture Image Segmentation. PhD dissertation, Univ. of Southern Calif., Jan. 1980.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Leventon, M., Grimson, E., and Faugeras, O. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Patt. Recog., 1, 316--323, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Malladi, R., Sethian, J. A., and Vemuri, B. C. Shape modeling with front propagation: A level set approach. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Recog. and Machine Intell., 17(2), 158--175, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mitchell, M., An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, (1996).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nordin, P., and Banzhaf, W. Programmatic compression of images and sound. In Genetic Programming 1996, Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, Koza J. R. et al. editors, pp. 345--350, MIT Press, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Perkins, S., Theiler, J., Brumby, S. P., Harvey, N. R., Porter, R. B., Szymanski, J. J., and Bloch. J. J. GENIE: A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Feature Classification in Multi-Spectral Images. Proc. SPIE 4120 Applications and Science of Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems, and Evolutionary Computation III, pp. 52--62, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pham, D. L., Xu, C., Prince, J. L. Survey of current methods in medical image segmentation. Annual Review of Biomedical Eng., 2, pp. 315--337, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Poli, R., and Cagoni, S. Genetic programming with user-driven selection: Experiments on the evolution of algorithms for image enhancement. In Genetic Programming 1997, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference, J. R. Koza et al. editors, pp. 269--277, 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sonka, M., Hlavac, V., and Boyle, R. Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision. London, Chapman & Hall, UK, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tsai, A., Yezzi, A., Wells, W., Tempany, C., Tucker, D., Fan, A., Grimson, E., Willsky A. A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 22,137--154, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Tsai, A., Wells, W., Warfield, S., Willsky, A. An EM algorithm for shape classification based on level sets. Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 5, 491--502, October 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Vese L. A., Chan, T. F. A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the Mumford and Shah model. Intl. J. Computer Vision, 50(3), 271--293, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Segmentation of medical images using a genetic algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '06: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2006
      2004 pages
      ISBN:1595931864
      DOI:10.1145/1143997

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      GECCO '06 Paper Acceptance Rate205of446submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader