ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Geometric crossover for multiway graph partitioning
Full text PdfPdf (259 KB)
Source Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Seattle, Washington, USA
SESSION: Genetic algorithms: papers table of contents
Pages: 1217 - 1224  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-186-4
Authors
Yong-Hyuk Kim  Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Yourim Yoon  Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Alberto Moraglio  University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Byung-Ro Moon  Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 74,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143997.1144189
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Geometric crossover is a representation-independent generalization of the traditional crossover defined using the distance of the solution space. Using a distance tailored to the problem at hand, the formal definition of geometric crossover allows to design new problem-specific crossovers that embed problem-knowledge in the search. The standard encoding for multiway graph partitioning is highly redundant: each solution has a number of representations, one for each way of labeling the represented partition. Traditional crossover does not perform well on redundant encodings. We propose a new geometric crossover for graph partitioning based on a labeling-independent distance that filters the redundancy of the encoding. A correlation analysis of the fitness landscape based on this distance shows that it is well suited to graph partitioning. Our new genetic algorithm outperforms existing ones.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Boese, K. D., Kahng, A. B., and Muddu, S. A new adaptive multi-start technique for combinatorial global optimizations. Operations Research Letters 15 (1994), 101--113.
 
3
 
4
Choi, S. S., and Moon, B. R. Normalization in genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2003), pp. 862--873.
5
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Hu, T. C., and Kuh, E. S. VLSI Curcuit Layout Theory and Design. IEEE Press, New York, 1985.
 
10
 
11
Jones, T. Evolutionary Algorithms, Fitness Landscapes and Search. PhD thesis, University of New Mexico, 1995.
 
12
Kang, S. J., and Moon, B. R. A hybrid genetic algorithm for multiway graph partitioning. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2000), pp. 159--166.
 
13
 
14
Kernighan, B., and Lin, S. An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. Bell Systems Technical Journal 49 (Feb. 1970), 291--307.
 
15
Kim, J. P., and Moon, B. R. A hybrid genetic search for multi-way graph partitioning based on direct partitioning. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2001), pp. 408--415.
 
16
17
 
18
Kuhn, H. W. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 2 (1955), 83--97.
 
19
Laszewski, G. Intelligent structural operators for the k-way graph partitioning problem. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (July 1991), pp. 45--52.
 
20
 
21
Moraglio, A., and Poli, R. Topological interpretation of crossover. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2004), pp. 1377--1388.
 
22
Moraglio, A., and Poli, R. Geometric crossover for the permutation representation. Technical Report CSM-429, University of Essex (2005).
23
 
24
Pardalos, P. M., and Resende, M. G. C., Eds. Handbook of Applied Optimization. Oxford University Press, 2002.
 
25
 
26
Weinberger, E. D. Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference. Biological Cybernetics 63 (1990), 325--336.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yong-Hyuk Kim: colleagues
Yourim Yoon: colleagues
Alberto Moraglio: colleagues
Byung-Ro Moon: colleagues