skip to main content
10.1145/1143997.1144239acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Evolving ensemble of classifiers in random subspace

Published:08 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Various methods for ensemble selection and classifier combination have been designed to optimize the results of ensembles of classifiers. Genetic algorithm (GA) which uses the diversity for the ensemble selection could be very time consuming. We propose compound diversity functions as objective functions for a faster and more effective GA searching. Classifiers selected by GA are combined by a proposed pairwise confusion matrix transformation, which offer strong performance boost for EoCs.

References

  1. L. I. Kuncheva and C. J. Whitaker, "Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy," Machine Learning, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 181--207, 2003]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. T. K. Ho, "The random space method for constructing decision forests," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 832--844, 1998]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Ruta and B. Gabrys, "Analysis of the Correlation between Majority Voting Error and the Diversity Measures in Multiple Classifier Systems," In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Soft Computing, 2001]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Giacinto and F. Roli, "Design of effective neural network ensembles for image classification purposes," Image and Vision Computing, vol. 19, no. 9-10, pp. 699--707, 2001]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. K. Turner and J. Ghosh, "Error Correlation and Error Reduction in Ensemble Classifiers," Connection Science, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 385--404, 1996]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. L. Fleiss, B. Levin, and M. C. Paik, "Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions," Second Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. G. Tremblay, R. Sabourin and P. Maupin, "Optimizing Nearest Neighbour in Random Subspace using a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm," In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2004), pp 208--211, 2004]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. M. J. Tax, M. Van Breukelen, R. P. W. Duin and J. Kittler, "Combining Multiple Classifiers by Averaging or by Multiplying," Pattern Recognition, vol.33, no. 9, pp.1475--1485, 2000]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. A. Shipp and L.I. Kuncheva, "Relationships between combination methods and measures of diversity in combining classifiers," International Journal of Information Fusion, vol.3, no. 2, pp. 135--148, 2002]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Y. S. Huang and C.Y. Suen, "A method of combining multiple experts for the recognition of unconstrained handwritten numerals," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 17, pp. 90--93, 1995]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. D. Wernecke, "A coupling procedure for discrimination of mixed data," Biometrics, vol. 48, pp. 97--506, 1992]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. L.I. Kuncheva, J.C. Bezdek and R.P.W. Duin, "Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison," Pattern Recognition, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 299--314, 2001]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. I. Kuncheva, M. Skurichina and R. P. W. Duin, "An Experimental Study on Diversity for Bagging and Boosting with Linear Classifiers," International Journal of Information Fusion, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 245--258, 2002]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R. Duin and J. Matas, "On Combining Classifiers," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 226--239, 1998]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. E. Banfield, L. O. Hall, K. W. Bowyer and W. P. Kegelmeyer, "A New Ensemble Diversity Measure Applied to Thinning Ensembles," International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS 2003), pp. 306 -- 316, 2003]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. Xu, A. Krzyzak and C. Y. Suen, "Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 418--435, 1992]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. P. W. Duin, "The Combining Classifier: To Train or Not to Train?" 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), vol. 2, pp. 20765, 2002]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. L. K. Hansen, C. Liisberg and P. Salamon, "The error-reject tradeoff," Open Systems and Information Dynamics, vol. 4, pp. 159--184, 1997]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. E. Eiben, R. Hinterding, and Z. Michalewicz, "Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms", In IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol.3, no. 2, pp. 124--141, 1998]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. L. I. Kuncheva, "A Theoretical Study on Six Classifier Fusion Strategies," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 281--286, 2002]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Milgram, M. Cheriet and R. Sabourin, "Estimating Accurate Multi-class Probabilities with Support Vector Machines," International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2005 (IJCNN 2005), pp. 1906--1911, 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Raudys, "Experts' boasting in trainable fusion rules," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1178 -- 1182, 2003]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. A. Shipp and L. I. Kuncheva, "Relationships Between Combination Methods and Measures of Diversity in Combining Classifiers," International Journal of Information Fusion, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 135 -- 148, 2002]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. R.P.W. Duin, "Pattern Recognition Toolbox for Matlab 5.0+," available free at: ftp://ftp.ph.tn.tudelft.nl/pub/bob/prtools]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D. Ruta and B. Gabrys, "Classifier Selection for Majority Voting," International Journal of Information Fusion, pp. 63--81, 2005]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. J. Kittler and F. M. Alkoot, "Relationship of Sum and Vote Fusion Strategies," Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS), pp. 339--348, 2001]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. H. Zouari, L. Heutte, Y. Lecourtier and A. Alimi, "Building Diverse Classifier Outputs to Evaluate the Behavior of Combination Methods: the Case of Two Classifiers," Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS), pp. 273--282, 2004]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Evolving ensemble of classifiers in random subspace

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '06: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
        July 2006
        2004 pages
        ISBN:1595931864
        DOI:10.1145/1143997

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 July 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        GECCO '06 Paper Acceptance Rate205of446submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader