ABSTRACT
Various methods for ensemble selection and classifier combination have been designed to optimize the results of ensembles of classifiers. Genetic algorithm (GA) which uses the diversity for the ensemble selection could be very time consuming. We propose compound diversity functions as objective functions for a faster and more effective GA searching. Classifiers selected by GA are combined by a proposed pairwise confusion matrix transformation, which offer strong performance boost for EoCs.
- L. I. Kuncheva and C. J. Whitaker, "Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy," Machine Learning, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 181--207, 2003]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. K. Ho, "The random space method for constructing decision forests," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 832--844, 1998]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Ruta and B. Gabrys, "Analysis of the Correlation between Majority Voting Error and the Diversity Measures in Multiple Classifier Systems," In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Soft Computing, 2001]]Google Scholar
- G. Giacinto and F. Roli, "Design of effective neural network ensembles for image classification purposes," Image and Vision Computing, vol. 19, no. 9-10, pp. 699--707, 2001]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Turner and J. Ghosh, "Error Correlation and Error Reduction in Ensemble Classifiers," Connection Science, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 385--404, 1996]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. L. Fleiss, B. Levin, and M. C. Paik, "Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions," Second Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Tremblay, R. Sabourin and P. Maupin, "Optimizing Nearest Neighbour in Random Subspace using a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm," In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2004), pp 208--211, 2004]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. J. Tax, M. Van Breukelen, R. P. W. Duin and J. Kittler, "Combining Multiple Classifiers by Averaging or by Multiplying," Pattern Recognition, vol.33, no. 9, pp.1475--1485, 2000]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. A. Shipp and L.I. Kuncheva, "Relationships between combination methods and measures of diversity in combining classifiers," International Journal of Information Fusion, vol.3, no. 2, pp. 135--148, 2002]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. S. Huang and C.Y. Suen, "A method of combining multiple experts for the recognition of unconstrained handwritten numerals," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 17, pp. 90--93, 1995]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. D. Wernecke, "A coupling procedure for discrimination of mixed data," Biometrics, vol. 48, pp. 97--506, 1992]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- L.I. Kuncheva, J.C. Bezdek and R.P.W. Duin, "Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison," Pattern Recognition, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 299--314, 2001]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. I. Kuncheva, M. Skurichina and R. P. W. Duin, "An Experimental Study on Diversity for Bagging and Boosting with Linear Classifiers," International Journal of Information Fusion, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 245--258, 2002]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R. Duin and J. Matas, "On Combining Classifiers," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 226--239, 1998]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. E. Banfield, L. O. Hall, K. W. Bowyer and W. P. Kegelmeyer, "A New Ensemble Diversity Measure Applied to Thinning Ensembles," International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS 2003), pp. 306 -- 316, 2003]]Google Scholar
- L. Xu, A. Krzyzak and C. Y. Suen, "Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 418--435, 1992]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. P. W. Duin, "The Combining Classifier: To Train or Not to Train?" 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), vol. 2, pp. 20765, 2002]]Google Scholar
- L. K. Hansen, C. Liisberg and P. Salamon, "The error-reject tradeoff," Open Systems and Information Dynamics, vol. 4, pp. 159--184, 1997]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. E. Eiben, R. Hinterding, and Z. Michalewicz, "Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms", In IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol.3, no. 2, pp. 124--141, 1998]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. I. Kuncheva, "A Theoretical Study on Six Classifier Fusion Strategies," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 281--286, 2002]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Milgram, M. Cheriet and R. Sabourin, "Estimating Accurate Multi-class Probabilities with Support Vector Machines," International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2005 (IJCNN 2005), pp. 1906--1911, 2005.]]Google Scholar
- S. Raudys, "Experts' boasting in trainable fusion rules," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1178 -- 1182, 2003]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. A. Shipp and L. I. Kuncheva, "Relationships Between Combination Methods and Measures of Diversity in Combining Classifiers," International Journal of Information Fusion, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 135 -- 148, 2002]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- R.P.W. Duin, "Pattern Recognition Toolbox for Matlab 5.0+," available free at: ftp://ftp.ph.tn.tudelft.nl/pub/bob/prtools]]Google Scholar
- D. Ruta and B. Gabrys, "Classifier Selection for Majority Voting," International Journal of Information Fusion, pp. 63--81, 2005]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Kittler and F. M. Alkoot, "Relationship of Sum and Vote Fusion Strategies," Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS), pp. 339--348, 2001]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Zouari, L. Heutte, Y. Lecourtier and A. Alimi, "Building Diverse Classifier Outputs to Evaluate the Behavior of Combination Methods: the Case of Two Classifiers," Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS), pp. 273--282, 2004]]Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Evolving ensemble of classifiers in random subspace
Recommendations
Pairwise fusion matrix for combining classifiers
Various fusion functions for classifier combination have been designed to optimize the results of ensembles of classifiers (EoC). We propose a pairwise fusion matrix (PFM) transformation, which produces reliable probabilities for the use of classifier ...
Applying pairwise fusion matrix on fusion functions for classifier combination
MCS'07: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Multiple classifier systemsWe propose a new classifier combination scheme for the ensemble of classifiers. The Pairwise Fusion Matrix (PFM) constructs confusion matrices based on classifier pairs and thus offers the estimated probability of each class based on each classifier ...
From dynamic classifier selection to dynamic ensemble selection
In handwritten pattern recognition, the multiple classifier system has been shown to be useful for improving recognition rates. One of the most important tasks in optimizing a multiple classifier system is to select a group of adequate classifiers, ...
Comments