| An O(1) RMRs leader election algorithm |
| Full text |
Pdf
(223 KB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
archive
Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
table of contents
Denver, Colorado, USA
SESSION: Shared memory
table of contents
Pages: 238 - 247
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-384-0
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 71, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The leader election problem is a fundamental distributed coordination problem. We present leader election algorithms for the cache-coherent (CC) and distributed shared memory (DSM) models using reads and writes only, for which the number of remote memory references (RMRs) is constant in the worst case.The algorithms use splitter-like objects [6, 8] in a novel way for the efficient partitioning of processes into disjoint sets that share work. As there is an Ω(log n/log log n) lower bound on the RMR complexity of mutual exclusion for n processes using reads and writes only [4], our result separates the mutual exclusion and leader election problems in terms of RMR complexity in both the CC and DSM models.Our result also implies that any algorithm using reads, writes and one-time test-and-set objects can be simulated by an algorithm using reads and writes with only a constant blowup of the RMR complexity. Anderson, Herman and Kim raise the question of whether conditional primitives such as test-and-set and compare-and-swap are stronger than read and write for the implementation of local-spin mutual exclusion [3]. We provide a negative answer to this question, at least for one-time test-and-set.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
R. Alur and G. Taubenfeld. Results about fast mutual exclusion. In Proc. RTSS 1992, pp. 154--162, 1992.
|
| |
2
|
J. Anderson. A fine-grained solution to the mutual exclusion problem. Acta Inf., 30(3):249--265, 1993.
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
CITED BY
|
Wojciech Golab , Vassos Hadzilacos , Danny Hendler , Philipp Woelfel, Constant-RMR implementations of CAS and other synchronization primitives using read and write operations, Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, August 12-15, 2007, Portland, Oregon, USA
|
|