Interdisciplinary analysis of digital government work

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Interdisciplinary analysis of digital government work

Full text

Pdf (161 KB)

Source

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 151 archive
Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Digital government research table of contents

San Diego, California

SESSION: Birds-of-a-feather table of contents

Pages: 481 - 483

Year of Publication: 2006

Authors

Hans J (Jochen) Scholl	University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Jens-Erik Mai	University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Raya Fidel	University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Sponsor

NSF : National Science Foundation

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 75, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTex EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1146598.1146757 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This bird-of-a-feather session attempts to break interdisciplinary ground in the context of work content, workflow, and work context analysis in Digital Government. The authors argue that using and connecting multiple theories and disciplines might yield more robust results and deeper understanding of the Digital Government evolution than strictly disciplinary research.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196--233). London: Routledge.
	2	Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan, or how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro sociologies (pp. 277--303). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
	3	Champy, J. (1995). Reengineering management: The mandate for new leadership (1st ed.). New York: HarperBusiness.
	4	Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester Sussex; New York: J. Wiley.
	5	Peter Checkland , Sue Holwell, Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1998
	6	Peter Checkland , Jim Scholes, Soft systems methodology in action, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1990
	7	Peter Checkland , Jim Scholes, Soft systems methodology in action, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1990
	8	Andrzej Cichocki , Marek Rusinkiewicz , Darrell Woelk, Workflow and Process Automation: Concepts and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1998
	9	Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial reengineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(Summer), 11--27.
	10	Thomas H. Davenport , Donna B. Stoddard, Reengineering: business change of mythic proportions?, MIS Quarterly, v.18 n.2, p.121-127, June 1994 [doi>10.2307/249760]
	11	DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147--160.
	12	Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 63--91.
	13	Fidel, R., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2004). From information behaviour research to the design of information systems: The cognitive work analysis framework. Information Research, 10(1), paper 210.
	14	Raya Fidel , Annelise Mark Pejtersen , Bryan Cleal , Harry Bruce, A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction: a case study of collaborative information retrieval, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v.55 n.11, p.939-953, September 2004 [doi>10.1002/asi.20041]
	15	Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
	16	Forrester, J. W. (1969a). Principles of systems; text and workbook chapters 1 through 10. Cambridge, Mass.: Wright-Allen Press.
	17	Forrester, J. W. (1969b). Urban dynamics. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
	18	Forrester, J. W. (1975). Collected papers of jay w. Forrester. Cambridge, Mass.: Wright-Allen Press.
	19	Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
	20	Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), p191 115p.
	21	Fuglseth, A. M., & Gronhaug, K. (1997). It-enabled redesign of complex and dynamic business processes: The case of bank credit evaluation. Omega, 25(1), 93.
	22	Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
	23	Varun Grover , James Teng , Albert H. Segars , Kirk Fiedler, The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: the IS executive's perspective, Information and Management, v.34 n.3, p.141-159, Oct. 1998 [doi>10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00054-8 ]
	24	Hammer, M. (1996). Beyond reengineering: How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives (1st ed.). New York: HarperBusiness.
	25	Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution (1st ed.). New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
	26	Hess, T., Figge, S., Hanekop, H., Hess, T., Hochstatter, I., Hogrefe, D., et al. (2005). Technische Möglichkeiten und Akzeptanz mobiler Anwendungen? Eine interdisziplinäre Betrachtung (technical potential and acceptance of mobile applications? An interdisciplinary perspective-in German). Wirtschaftsinformatik, 47(1), 6--16.
	27	Hofacker, I., & Vetschera, R. (2001). Algorithmical approaches to business process design. Computers & Operations Research, 28(13), 1253.
	28	Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Stoddard, D. B. (1998). Business process redesign: Radical and evolutionary change. Journal of Business Research, 41(1), 15.
	29	Kallio, J., Saarinen, T., Salo, S., Tinnila, M., & Vepsalainen, A. P. J. (1999). Drivers and tracers of business process changes. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(2), 125.
	30	Kumar, S., & Strehlow, R. (2004). Business process redesign as a tool for organizational development. Technovation, 24(11), 853.
	31	Selma Limam Mansar , Hajo A. Reijers, Best practices in business process redesign: validation of a redesign framework, Computers in Industry, v.56 n.5, p.457-471, June 2005 [doi>10.1016/j.compind.2005.01.001]
	32	Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853--866.
	33	Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398--427.
	34	T. Pardo , H. Scholl, Walking atop the Cliffs--Avoiding Failure and Reducing Risk in Large-Scale E-government Projects, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02)-Volume 5, p.124.2, January 07-10, 2002
	35	Pardo, T. A., Scholl, H. J. J., Cook, M. E., Connelly, D. R., & Dawes, S. S. (2000). New york state central accounting system stakeholder needs analysis. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government.
	36	Pejtersen, A. M. (1985). Implications of users' value perception for the design of a bibliographic retrieval system. In J. C. Agrawal & P. Zunde (Eds.), Empirical foundations of information and software science (pp. 23--37). New York: Plenum Press.
	37	Pejtersen, A. M., & Rasmussen, J. (1997). Ecological information systems: Coupling work domain information to user characteristics. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd, completely rev. ed., pp. 315--345). Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier.
	38	Michael Pidd, Computer Simulation in Management Science, John Wiley & Sons, 2004
	39	Jens Rasmussen, Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY, 1986
	40	Jens Rasmussen , Annelise Mark Pejtersen , L. P. Goodstein, Cognitive systems engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1994
	41	Reijers, H. A., & Liman Mansar, S. (2005). Best practices in business process redesign: An overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. Omega, 33(4), 283.
	42	George P. Richardson, Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1991
	43	Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
	44	John Sterman, Business Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 2000
	45	J. Leon Zhao , Edward A. Stohr, Temporal workflow management in a claim handling system, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.24 n.2, p.187-195, March 1999
	46	Tatnall, A., & Gilding, A. (1999, December, 1 to 3). Actor-network theory and information systems research. Paper presented at the Tenth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Wellington, NZ.
	47	Kim J. Vicente, Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1999
	48	Zhao, J. L., Kumar, A., & Stohr, E. A. (2000). Workflow-centric communication mechanisms for organizational knowledge distribution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 45--72.