|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
This paper analyzes the power-area trade-off of functionally equivalent architectural implementations of a speech enhancement algorithm for hearing aids. Gate-level simulations and measurements show that an optimum degree of resource sharing (0.60mW in a 0.25μm CMOS process) is more energy-efficient than both the fully time-multiplexed (1.42mW) and the isomorphic architecture (1.54mW), without overly large area overhead (0.77mm2 against 0.43mm2 and 4.31mm2, respectively). REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||