Report on the ad-hoc track of the INEX 2005 workshop

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Report on the ad-hoc track of the INEX 2005 workshop

Full text

Pdf (214 KB)

Source

ACM SIGIR Forum archive
Volume 40 , Issue 1 (June 2006) table of contents

WORKSHOP SESSION: INEX reports table of contents

Pages: 49 - 57

Year of Publication: 2006

ISSN:0163-5840

Authors

Mounia Lalmas	University of London
Gabriella Kazai	University of London

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 20, Citation Count: 2

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTex EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1147197.1147207 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The INitiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) has, since 2002, been working towards the goal of establishing an infrastructure, in the form of a large XML test collection and appropriate scoring methods, for the evaluation of content-oriented XML retrieval systems. In 2005, 47 organizations registered to participate in INEX. Throughout the year a number of groups dropped out due to resource requirements, while 11 further groups joined. INEX 2005 concluded with a total of 41 active groups. In addition to the main ad-hoc retrieval track, six further research tracks were included in INEX 2005, each studying different aspects of XML information access: interactive, relevance feedback, heterogeneous, natural language processing, and two new tracks for 2005, multimedia and document mining tracks.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas, S. Malik, and G. Kazai. (eds) Advances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop of the INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX 2005), Schloss Dagstuhl, 28-30 November 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 3977, Springer-Verlag, 2006.
	2	Kalervo Järvelin , Jaana Kekäläinen, Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.20 n.4, p.422-446, October 2002 [doi>10.1145/582415.582418]
	3	G. Kazai and M. Lalmas. INEX 2005 evaluation metrics. In {1}.
	4	S. Malik, G. Kazai, M. Lalmas, and N. Fuhr. Overview of INEX 2005. In {1}.
	5	J. Pehcevski and J. A. Thom. HiXEval: Highlighting XML Retrieval Evaluation. In {1}.
	6	A. Trotman and M. Lalmas. The Interpretation of CAS. In {1}.
	7	A. Trotman and B. Sigurbjörnsson. Narrowed extended XPATH I (NEXI). In Advances in XML Information Retrieval, Third Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX 2004), Dagstuhl, Germany, December 6-8, 2004, Revised Selected Papers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 3493, Springer-Verlag, page 16--40, 2005.
	8	A. de Vries, G. Kazai and M. Lalmas. Tolerance to Irrelevance: A User-effort Oriented Evaluation of Retrieval Systems without Predefined Retrieval Unit RIAO 2004 Conference on Coupling approaches, coupling media and coupling languages for information retrieval, University of Avignon (Vaucluse), France, April 2004.

CITED BY 2

	Barbara Hammer-Aebi , Kirstine Wilfred Christensen , Haakon Lund , Birger Larsen, Users, structured documents and overlap: interactive searching of elements and the influence of context on search behaviour, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information interaction in context, October 18-20, 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark
	Lobna Hlaoua , Mohand Boughanem , Karen Pinel-Sauvagnat, Combination of evidences in relevance feedback for xml retrieval, Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management, November 06-10, 2007, Lisbon, Portugal