ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
States merging in LR parser
Full text PdfPdf (164 KB)
Source ACM SIGPLAN Notices archive
Volume 41 ,  Issue 4  (April 2006) table of contents
COLUMN: Technical correspondence table of contents
Pages: 24 - 29  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:0362-1340
Authors
Dillip Kumar Lenka  Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Pawan Kumar  Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1147214.1147219
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Here a scheme is presented, which reduces the size of an LR parser. It is accomplished by merging two states, which do not perform differently on the same input symbol or non-terminal. This state merging has following advantages:1. The reduction in number of states is greater than the reduction in an LALR parser.2. The power of parser is not reduced as it would be in an LALR parser.The above merging scheme has following disadvantages:1. Even erroneous inputs are accepted. However, it is stopped by changing the notion of acceptance.2. Errors are report late and in a misleading manner.3. Parsing takes more time because string matching is done during reduction.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1

Collaborative Colleagues:
Dillip Kumar Lenka: colleagues
Pawan Kumar: colleagues