ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora
Full text PdfPdf (233 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Seattle, Washington, USA
SESSION: Handling messages and finding experts table of contents
Pages: 43 - 50  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-369-7
Authors
Krisztian Balog  ISLA, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan, Amsterdam
Leif Azzopardi  University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Maarten de Rijke  ISLA, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan, Amsterdam
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 30,   Downloads (12 Months): 237,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1148170.1148181
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Searching an organization's document repositories for experts provides a cost effective solution for the task of expert finding. We present two general strategies to expert searching given a document collection which are formalized using generative probabilistic models. The first of these directly models an expert's knowledge based on the documents that they are associated with, whilst the second locates documents on topic, and then finds the associated expert. Forming reliable associations is crucial to the performance of expert finding systems. Consequently, in our evaluation we compare the different approaches, exploring a variety of associations along with other operational parameters (such as topicality). Using the TREC Enterprise corpora, we show that the second strategy consistently outperforms the first. A comparison against other unsupervised techniques, reveals that our second model delivers excellent performance.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
N. Craswell, D. Hawking, A. M. Vercoustre, and P. Wilkins. P@noptic expert: Searching for experts not just for documents. In Ausweb, 2001. URL: http://es.csiro.au/pubs/craswell_ausweb01.pdf.
 
3
N. Craswell, A. de Vries, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the trec-2005 enterprise track. TREC 2005 Conference Notebook, pages 199--205, 2005.
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
D. Hiemstra. Using Language Models for Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, University of Twente, 2001.
 
10
H. Kautz, B. Selman, and A. Milewski. Agent amplified communication. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), pages 3--9, 1996.
 
11
12
13
14
15
16
 
17
TREC. Enterprise track, 2005. URL: http://www.ins.cwi.nl/projects/trec-ent/wiki/.
 
18
W3C. The W3C test collection, 2005. URL: http://research.microsoft.com/users/nickcr/w3c-summary.html.
 
19
D. Yimam. Expert finding systems for organizations: Domain analysis and the demoir approach. In ECSCW 999 Workshop: Beyond KNowledge Management: Managing Expertise, pages 276--283, New York, NY, USA, 1996. ACM Press.
 
20
D. Yimam-Seid and A. Kobsa. Expert finding systems for organizations: Problem and domain analysis and the demoir approach. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(1): 1--24, 2003.
21

CITED BY  9
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Krisztian Balog: colleagues
Leif Azzopardi: colleagues
Maarten de Rijke: colleagues