ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparing two blind relevance feedback techniques
Full text PdfPdf (277 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Seattle, Washington, USA
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages: 649 - 650  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-369-7
Authors
Daqing He  University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Yefei Peng  University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 164,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1148170.1148299
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Evans and R. Lefferts. Design and evaluation of the clarit-trec-2 system. In Proceedings of the Second Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-2) 1994.
2