A follow up study of the effect of personality on the performance of software engineering teams

ABSTRACT

This paper describes ethnographic observations and analysis of the performance of student teams working on year-long software projects (2004-2005 UK academic year) for industrial clients. Personality types were measured using an online version of the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), as a basis for studying how individuals interacted within the teams, and the effects of disruptive issues on the quality of work produced by the team. The behavior of the observed teams is analyzed and the results compared with those from the previous year's (2003-2004) research, also carried out on student teams. A significant finding in 2003-2004 was that issues which teams did not discuss adequately caused more problems for the quality of work than issues which produced actual disruption within the team; the results from 2004-2005 differ in that actual disruptions proved most damaging to the teams involved.

REFERENCES

• 1: Robert P. Bostrom , Kate M. Kaiser, Personality differences within systems project teams: Implications for designing solving centers, Proceedings of the eighteenth annual computer personnel research conference, p.248-285, June 04-05, 1981, Washington, D.C., United States [doi>10.1145/800051.801855]
• 2: Costa, P. and McCrae, R. Four ways, five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13. 653--665.
• 3: Luiz Fernando Capretz, Personality types in software engineering, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.58 n.2, p.207-214, February 2003 [doi>10.1016/S1071-5819(02)00137-4]
• 4: Furnham, A. The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21. 303--307.
• 5: HumanMetrics. http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgiwin/JTypes2.asp.
• 6: Jung, C.G. Psychological Types The Collected Works of C.G Jung, Harcourt Press, 1923.
• 7: Karn, J.S. and Cowling, A.J. An Initial Observational Study of the Effects of Personality Type on Software Engineering Teams. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2004). 155--165
• 8: Karn, J.S. and Cowling, A.J. An initial study of the effect of personality on group projects in software engineering. Department of Computer Science Research Report CS-04-01, University of Sheffield.
• 9: Karn, J.S. and Cowling, A.J. A Study into the Effect of Disruptions on the Performance of Software Engineering Teams. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, (ISESE 2005). 417--427.
• 10: Karn, J.S. and Cowling, A.J. A study into the effect of disruptions on the performance of software engineering teams. Department of Computer Science Research Report CS-04-17, University of Sheffield.
• 11: Myers, I.B. and Myers, P.B. Gift's Differing: Understanding Personality Type, Davis Black Publishing, California, 1987.
• 12: Rebecca H. Rutherfoord, Using personality inventories to help form teams for software engineering class projects, Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, p.73-76, June 2001, Canterbury, United Kingdom
• 13: Joy Teague, Personality type, career preference and implications for computer science recruitment and teaching, Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on Computer science education, p.155-163, July 08-10, 1998, The University of Queensland, Australia [doi>10.1145/289393.289416]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.9 Management
          Subjects: Programming teams

General Terms:
Human Factors, Management

Keywords:
Myers-Briggs type indicator, ethnographic observations, group work in software engineering, jungian personality types