ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Secure multiparty computation of approximations
Full text PdfPdf (398 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 3  (July 2006) table of contents
Pages: 435 - 472  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1549-6325
Authors
Joan Feigenbaum  Yale University, New Haven, CT
Yuval Ishai  Technion, Haifa, Israel
Tal Malkin  Columbia University, New York, NY
Kobbi Nissim  Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
Martin J. Strauss  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Rebecca N. Wright  Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 145,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1159892.1159900
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Approximation algorithms can sometimes provide efficient solutions when no efficient exact computation is known. In particular, approximations are often useful in a distributed setting where the inputs are held by different parties and may be extremely large. Furthermore, for some applications, the parties want to compute a function of their inputs securely without revealing more information than necessary. In this work, we study the question of simultaneously addressing the above efficiency and security concerns via what we call secure approximations.We start by extending standard definitions of secure (exact) computation to the setting of secure approximations. Our definitions guarantee that no additional information is revealed by the approximation beyond what follows from the output of the function being approximated. We then study the complexity of specific secure approximation problems. In particular, we obtain a sublinear-communication protocol for securely approximating the Hamming distance and a polynomial-time protocol for securely approximating the permanent and related #P-hard problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Alon, N., Gibbons, P. B., Matias, Y., and Szegedy, M. 2002. Tracking join and self-join sizes in limited storage. J. Comput. Syst. Science 64, 3, 719--747.
 
3
 
4
Alon, N. and Spencer, J. 1992. The Probabilistic Method. John Wiley.
 
5
Bar-Yossef, Z. 2004. Personal Communication.
 
6
7
8
9
10
 
11
Cachin, C., Micali, S., and Stadler, M. 1999. Computationally private information retrieval with polylogarithmic communication. In Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT'99). Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1592. Springer-Verlag, 404--414.
 
12
Canetti, R. 2000. Security and composition of multiparty cryptographic protocols. J. Cryptology 13, 1, 143--202.
 
13
14
15
16
 
17
 
18
DIMACS. Special year on massive data sets. 1997--1999. http://dimacs.rutgers.edu/SpecialYears/1997_1998/.
 
19
Dodis, Y., Reyzin, L., and Smith, A. 2004. Fuzzy extractors: How to generate strong keys from biometrics and other noisy data. In Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT'04) Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3027. Springer-Verlag, 523--540.
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
Freedman, M., Nissim, K., and Pinkas, B. 2004. Efficient private matching and set intersection. In Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT'04) Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3027. Springer-Verlag, 1--19.
 
25
Gavinsky, D., Kempe, J., and de Wolf, R. 2004. Quantum communication cannot simulate a public coin. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0411051.
 
26
Gentry, C., and Ramzan, Z. 2005. Single-database private information retrieval with constant communication rate. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming. 803--815.
 
27
 
28
29
 
30
Goldwasser, S., and Micali, S. 1984. Probabilistic encryption. J. Comput. Syst. Sciences 28, 270--299.
31
 
32
 
33
Indyk, P., and Woodruff, D. P. 2006. Polylogarithmic private approximations and efficient matching. In Proceedings of the 3rd Theory of Cryptography Conference. 245--264.
34
 
35
36
 
37
38
 
39
Katz, J., Ostrovsky, R., and Smith, A. 2003. Round efficiency of multi-party computation with a dishonest majority. In Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT'03) Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2656. Springer-Verlag, 578--595.
 
40
 
41
 
42
 
43
Lindell, Y. 2003. Parallel coin-tossing and constant-round secure two-party computation. J. Cryptol. 16, 3, 143--184.
 
44
Lindell, Y., and Pinkas, B. 2002. Privacy preserving data mining. J. Cryptol. 15, 3, 177--206.
 
45
Lipmaa, H. 2005. An oblivious transfer protocol with log-squared communication. In Proceedings of the 8th Information Security Conference (ISC'05). J. Zhou and J. Lopez, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3650. Springer-Verlag, 314--328.
 
46
Mann, E. 1998. Private access to distributed information. M.S. thesis, Technion (Israel Institute of Technology), Haifa, Israel.
 
47
 
48
Minc, H. 1982. Permanents. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 6. Addison-Wesley.
 
49
50
 
51
Naor, M., and Pinkas, B. 2005. Computationally secure oblivious transfer. J. Cryptol. 18, 1, 1--35.
52
 
53
Rabin, M. O. 1981. How to exchange secrets by oblivious transfer. Tech. rep. TR-81, Aiken Computation Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
 
54
 
55
Yao, A. 1982. Protocols for secure computation. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 160--164.
56

Collaborative Colleagues:
Joan Feigenbaum: colleagues
Yuval Ishai: colleagues
Tal Malkin: colleagues
Kobbi Nissim: colleagues
Martin J. Strauss: colleagues
Rebecca N. Wright: colleagues