ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Interference-aware fair rate control in wireless sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (1.66 MB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications table of contents
Pisa, Italy
SESSION: Wireless table of contents
Pages: 63 - 74  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-308-5
Also published in ...
Authors
Sumit Rangwala  University of Southern California
Ramakrishna Gummadi  University of Southern California
Ramesh Govindan  University of Southern California
Konstantinos Psounis  University of Southern California
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 290,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1159913.1159922
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In a wireless sensor network of N nodes transmitting data to a single base station, possibly over multiple hops, what distributed mechanisms should be implemented in order to dynamically allocate fair and efficient transmission rates to each node? Our interferenceaware fair rate control (IFRC) detects incipient congestion at a node by monitoring the average queue length, communicates congestion state to exactly the set of potential interferers using a novel low-overhead congestion sharing mechanism, and converges to a fair and efficient rate using an AIMD control law. We evaluate IFRC extensively on a 40-node wireless sensor network testbed. IFRC achieves a fair and efficient rate allocation that is within 20-40% of the optimal fair rate allocation on some network topologies. Its rate adaptation mechanism is highly effective: we did not observe a single instance of queue overflow in our many experiments. Finally, IFRC can be extended easily to support situations where only a subset of the nodes transmit, where the network has multiple base stations, or where nodes are assigned different transmission weights.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
Cheng Tien Ee and Ruzena Bajcsy. Congestion Control and Fairness for Many-to-One Routing in Sensor Networks. In SenSys '04.
5
 
6
 
7
R. Govindan, E. Kohler, D. Estrin, F. Bian, K. Chintalapudi, O. Gnawali, S. Rangwala, R. Gummadi, and T. Stathopoulos. Tenet: An Architecture for Tiered Embedded Networks. CENS Technical Report 56, 2005.
 
8
B. Greenstein, A. Pesterev, C. Mar, E. Kohler, J. Judy, S. Farschi, and D. Estrin. Collecting High-Rate Data Over low-rate Sensor Network Radios. CENS Technical Report 55, 2005.
 
9
G. Holland and N. Vaidya. Impact of Routing and Link Layers on TCP Performance in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. In IEEE WCNC '99.
10
11
12
13
14
15
 
16
D. Kim, C.-K. Toh, and Y. Choi. TCP-BuS: Improving TCP Performance in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks. In ICC '00.
 
17
V. Kottapalli, A. Kiremidjian, J. P. Lynch, E. Carryer, T. Kenny, K. Law, and Y. Lei. A Two-Tier Wireless Sensor Network Architecture for Structural Health Monitoring. In Proc. of SPIE's 2003.
18
 
19
P. Levis, N. Patel, D. Culler, and S. Shenker. Trickle: A Self-Regulating Algo-rithm for Code Propagation and Maintenance in Wireless Sensor Networks In NSDI '04.
 
20
P. E. McKenney. Stochastic Fairness Queuing. In INFOCOMM '90.
 
21
K. Mechitov, W. Y. Kim, G. Agha, and T. Nagayama. High-Frequency Dis-tributed Sensing for Structure Monitoring. In INSS '04.
 
22
J. Paek, K. Chintalapudi, J. Cafferey, R. Govindan, and S. Masri. A Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Health Monitoring: Performance and experi-ence. In EmNetS '05.
23
24
25
 
26
A. Sridharan and B. Krishnamachari. Max-Min Fair Collision-Free Scheduling for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Workshop on Multihop Wireless Networks (MWN'04), IPCCC.
 
27
F. Stann and J. Heidemann. Rmst: Reliable Data Transport in Sensor Networks. In SNPA '03.
28
29
30
31
32
33
 
34
W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks, In Infocom '02.
35

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sumit Rangwala: colleagues
Ramakrishna Gummadi: colleagues
Ramesh Govindan: colleagues
Konstantinos Psounis: colleagues