ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Managing social influences through argumentation-based negotiation
Full text PdfPdf (245 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Argumentation and negotiation table of contents
Pages: 426 - 428  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
Authors
Nishan C. Karunatillake  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Nicholas R. Jennings  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Iyad Rahwan  The British University in Dubai, Dubai, UAE
Sarvapali D. Ramchurn  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Sponsors
IFMAS : The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
ATAL : The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 20,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160633.1160710
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Social influences play an important part in the actions that an individual agent may perform within a multi-agent society. However, the incomplete knowledge and the diverse and conflicting influences present within such societies, may stop an agent from abiding by all its social influences. This may, in turn, lead to conflicts that the agents need to identify, manage, and resolve in order for the society to behave in a coherent manner. To this end, we present an empirical study of an argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) approach that allows the agents to detect such conflicts, and then manage and resolve them through the use of argumentative dialogues. To test our theory, we map our ABN model to a multi-agent task allocation scenario. Our results show that using an argumentation approach allows agents to both efficiently and effectively manage their social influences even under high degrees of incompleteness. Finally, we show that allowing agents to argue and resolve such conflicts early in the negotiation encounter increases their efficiency in managing social influences.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. Castelfranchi. Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In Proc. of ICMAS'95, pages 41--48, San Francisco, CA, 1995.
 
2
N. C. Karunatillake and N. R. Jennings. Is it worth arguing? In Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, LNAI 3366, pages 234--250, NY, USA, 2004.
 
3
N. C. Karunatillake, N. R. Jennings, I. Rahwan, and T. J. Norman. Arguing and negotiating in the presence of social influences. In Proc. of CEEMAS'05, LNAI 3690, pages 223--235, Budapest, Hungary, 2005.
4

Collaborative Colleagues:
Nishan C. Karunatillake: colleagues
Nicholas R. Jennings: colleagues
Iyad Rahwan: colleagues
Sarvapali D. Ramchurn: colleagues