ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Structural evaluation of agent organizations
Full text PdfPdf (160 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Hakodate, Japan
SESSION: Scalability, security, and performance analysis table of contents
Pages: 1110 - 1112  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-303-4
Authors
Davide Grossi  Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Frank Dignum  Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Virginia Dignum  Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Mehdi Dastani  Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Lambèr Royakkers  Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Sponsors
IFMAS : The International Foundation for Multiagent Systems
ATAL : The International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 36,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1160633.1160833
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A multi-agent system can be analyzed and specified as an organization consisting of roles and their relations. The performance of an organization depends on many factors among which the topology of its organizational structure, i.e., the set of relations holding between its roles. This short paper provides the sketch of quantitative methods for addressing the issue of the analysis, evaluation, and comparison of organizational structures. To this aim, quantitative concepts from graph theory are applied which deliver numerical analyzes of organizational structures. Here, an illustrative number of these concepts is sketched and their connection to properties that are commonly indicated as critical for organizations (robustness, flexibility and efficiency) is shown.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Etzioni. Modern Organizations. Prentice Hall, 1964.
 
2
M. F. Friedell. Organizations as semilattices. American Sociological Review, 32:46--54, 1967.
3
 
4
F. Harary. Graph theoretic methods in the management sciences. Managemenet Science, 5(4):387--403, 1959.
 
5
B. Horling and V. Lesser. A Survey of Multi-Agent Organizational Paradigms. Computer Science Technical Report 04--45, University of Massachusetts, May 2004.
 
6
 
7
O. Morgenstern. Prolegomena to a theory of organizations. Manuscript, 1951.
 
8
M. Schoemaker. Identity in flexible organizations: Experiences. In Dutch Organizations Creativity and Innovation Management, volume 12, December 2003.
 
9
W. Stimson. The Robust Organization: Transforming Your Company Using Adaptive Design. Irwin Professional Publishing, 1996.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Davide Grossi: colleagues
Frank Dignum: colleagues
Virginia Dignum: colleagues
Mehdi Dastani: colleagues
Lambèr Royakkers: colleagues