Is problem solving, or simulation model solving, mission critical?

ABSTRACT

How do we consider problems and models in the practice of simulation? It is our possibly contentious observation that simulation model solving seems to be more critical to the mission of simulation modeling than problem solving. Inspired by the theme of this year's Winter Simulation Conference, we ask the question, "Is problem solving, or simulation model solving, mission critical?" To investigate this we look at three perspectives, those of the textbook, the article and the editorial. The textbook perspective is the balance of the "traditional" view of simulation presented by the academic textbook against practical experience. The article perspective is a classification of papers published in four leading simulation journals in the year 2004 (ACM TOMACS, SIMULATION, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, and Simulation & Gaming). The editorial perspective is a discussion of editorial policy presented by the same journals. Our findings show that our observation is not contradicted.

REFERENCES

• 1: Vlatka Hlupic , Ray J. Paul, Simulating an automated paint shop in the electronics industry, Simulation Practice and Theory, v.1 n.5, p.195-205, May 16, 1994 [doi>10.1016/0928-4869(94)90010-8 ]
• 2: Averill M. Law , David M. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1999
• 3: Ray J. Paul , Tillal Eldabi , Jasna Kuljis, Perspectives on simulation in education and training: simulation education is no substitute for intelligent thinking, Proceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation, December 07-10, 2003, New Orleans, Louisiana
• 4: K. D Tocher, The art of simulation, English Universities Press, 1967