ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Usability study of the virtual test bed and distributed simulation
Full text PdfPdf (197 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Orlando, Florida
SESSION: Aerospace and military applications: simulation in aerospace II: distributed simulations table of contents
Pages: 1298 - 1305  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:0-7803-9519-0
Authors
Jeffrey W. Dawson  University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Ping Chen  University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Yanshen Zhu  University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   

ABSTRACT

Improving the usability of a Distributed Simulation System (DSS) test bed is the focus of this paper. An introduction to the field of usability is given, followed by a discussion of the characteristics of DSSs. Then the usability of DSSs is considered. The Virtual Test Bed (VTB), a sample DSS we have improved the usability of, is described. The methodology used to improve the VTB's usability is given. With the goal of improving usability for end users, proto-typing of a graphical user interface is discussed; both software and paper prototypes are considered. Lessons learned provide insights into problems we encountered. Research on important aspects of DSSs that affect usability is reflected in a table that summarizes key issues. Our anticipated future research in this area is also discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adelantado, Martin. 2004. Rapid prototying of airport advanced operational systems and procedures through distributed simulation. Simulation 80 (1):5--20.
 
2
Adelantado, Martin, and Thibault Deman. 2002. A-CMSI: an airport-common modeling and simulation infrastructure using High-Level Architecture. Simulation 73 (2).
 
3
 
4
Defense Modeling and Simulation Office. High Level Architecture 2004. Available via <https://www.dmso.mil/public/transition/hla/>
 
5
Ceranowicz, A., R. Dehncke, and T. Cerri. 2003. Moving toward a distributed continuous experimentation environment. In Proceedings of the 2003 Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference, 1--11.
 
6
 
7
Fowler, John W., and Oliver Rose. 2004. Grand challenges in modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing systems. Simulation 80 (9):469--476.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Snyder, Carolyn. 2003. Paper prototyping. San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeffrey W. Dawson: colleagues
Ping Chen: colleagues
Yanshen Zhu: colleagues