ABSTRACT
Managing large amounts of dynamic visual information involves understanding changes happening out of the user's sight. In this paper, we show how current software does not adequately support users in this task, and motivate the need for a more general approach. We propose an image-based storage, visualization, and implicit interaction paradigm called mnemonic rendering that provides better support for handling visual changes. Once implemented on a system, mnemonic rendering techniques can benefit all applications. We explore its rich design space and discuss its expected benefits as well as limitations based on feedback from users of a small-screen and a wall-size prototype.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Slides from the presentation
Supplemental material for Mnemonic rendering: an image-based approach for exposing hidden changes in dynamic displays
- Banbury, B. and Tremblay, S., eds. (2004). A cognitive approach to situation awareness: theory and application. Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., and Robertson, G. (2003). High-density cursor: A visualization technique that helps users keep track of fast-moving mouse cursors. Interact. p. 236--243.Google Scholar
- Baudisch, P. and Gutwin, C. (2004). Multiblending: displaying overlapping windows simultaneously without the drawbacks of alpha blending. ACM CHI Conference. p. 367--374. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bier, E., Stone, M., Pier, K., Buxton, W., and DeRose, T. (1993). Toolglass and Magic Lenses: The see-through interface. ACM SIGGRAPH. p. 73--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang, B., Mackinlay, J., Zellweger, P., and Igarashi, T. (1998). A negotiation architecture for fluid documents. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 123--132. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang, B. and Ungar, D. (1993). Animation: From cartoons to the user interface. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 45--55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chapuis, O. and Roussel, N. (2005). Metisse is not a 3D desktop! ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 13--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cockburn, A., Greenberg, S., Jones, S., McKenzie, B., and Moyle, M. (2003). Improving web page revisitation: Analysis, design and evaluation. Special Issue on Web Navigation Skills, IT & Society, 3(1). p. 159--183.Google Scholar
- Edwards, W. K., Igarashi, T., LaMarca, A., and Mynatt, E. D. (2000). A temporal model for multi-level undo and redo. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 31--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Endsley, M., Bolté, B., and Jones, D. (2003). Designing for situation awareness: CRC.Google Scholar
- Freeman, E. and Fertig, S. (1995). Lifestreams: Organizing your electronic life. AAAI Fall Symposium: AI Applications in Knowledge Navigation and Retrieval.Google Scholar
- Grudin, J. (2001). Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. ACM CHI Conference. p. 458--465. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hunt, A. R. and Andkingstone, A. (2003). Covert and overt voluntary attention: linked or independent? Cognitive Brain Research, 18. p. 102--105.Google Scholar
- Hutchings, D. R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., and Robertson, G. (2004). Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. ACM AVI Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. p. 32--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hutchings, D. R. and Stasko, J. (2004). Revisiting display space management: understanding current practice to inform next-generation design. Graphics Interface Conference. p. 127--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Itti, L., Rees, G., and Tsotsos, J., eds. (2005). Neurobiology of attention. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Jacob, R. J. K. (1993). Eye-movement-based human-computer interaction techniques: Toward non-command interfaces. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, D. Hix, Editor. Ablex. chapter 6. p. 151--190.Google Scholar
- Jaynes, C., Webb, S., Steele, R. M., Brown, M., and Seales, W. B. (2001). Dynamic shadow removal from front projection displays. IEEE Visualization. p. 175--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kawasaki, Y. and Igarashi, T. (2004). Regional undo for spreadsheets. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Demo abstract.Google Scholar
- Kurlander, D. and Feiner, S. (1992). A history-based macro by example system. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 99--106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mertz, C., Chatty, S., and Vinot, J. (2000). Pushing the limits of ATC user interface design beyond S&M interaction: the DigiStrips experience. 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar.Google Scholar
- Moscovich, T. and Hughes, J. F. (2004). Navigating documents with the virtual scroll ring. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 57--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rekimoto, J. (1999). Time-machine computing: a time-centric approach for the information environment. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 45--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Renaud, K. (2000). Expediting rapid recovery from interruptions by providing a visualization of application activity. OZCHI. p. 348--355.Google Scholar
- Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53. p. 245--277.Google Scholar
- Ringel, M. (2003). When one isn't enough: An analysis of virtual desktop usage strategies and their implications for design. ACM CHI Conference (Ext. Abstracts). p. 762--763. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salembier, P. and Marques, F. (1999). Region-based representations of image and video: Segmentation tools for multimedia services. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 9(8). p. 1147--1169. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Skopik, A. and Gutwin, C. (2005). Improving revisitation in fisheye views with visit wear. ACM CHI Conference. p. 771--780. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, G. M. and schraefel, m. c. (2004). The radial scroll tool: scrolling support for stylus- or touch-based document navigation. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 53--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tam, J. and Greenberg, S. (In press - accepted 2005). A framework for asynchronous change awareness in collaborative documents and workspaces. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tomitsch, M. (2003). Trends and evolution of window interfaces. Thesis, University of Technology: Vienna.Google Scholar
- Turk, M. (2004). Computer vision in the interface. Communications of the ACM, 47(1). p. 60--67. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Varakin, D. A. and Levin, D. T. (2004). Unseen and unaware: Implications of recent research on failures of visual awareness for human-computer interface design. Human-Computer Interaction, 19. p. 389--422. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venolia, G. D., Dabbish, L., Cadiz, J. J., and Gupta, A. (2001). Supporting email Workflow. Tech Report MSR-TR-2001-88. Microsoft Research.Google Scholar
- Vertegaal, R., Mamuji, A., Sohn, C., and Cheng, D. Media eyepliances: using eye tracking for remote control focus selection of appliances. ACM CHI Conference (Extended Abstracts). p. 1861--1864. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, X. and Jin, J. (2001). A quantitative analysis for decomposing visual signal of the gaze displacement. Pan-Sydney area workshop on visual informtaion processing conference on visual information processing 2001. p. 153--159. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wexelblat, A. and Maes, P. (1999). Footprints: History-rich tools for information foraging. ACM CHI Conference. p. 279--277. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whittaker, S. and Sidner, C. (1996). Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. ACM CHI Conference. p. 276--283. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Woods, D. D. and Watts, J. C. (1997). How not to have to navigate through too many displays. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Mnemonic rendering: an image-based approach for exposing hidden changes in dynamic displays
Recommendations
Multiple light field rendering
GRAPHITE '03: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East AsiaA light field is a 4D function describing the radiance across a boundary between the volume containing a scene, and the disjoint volume in which the eyepoint may be placed. Light field rendering is the process of rendering novel views of a scene ...
Comments