skip to main content
10.1145/1166253.1166279acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Mnemonic rendering: an image-based approach for exposing hidden changes in dynamic displays

Published:15 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Managing large amounts of dynamic visual information involves understanding changes happening out of the user's sight. In this paper, we show how current software does not adequately support users in this task, and motivate the need for a more general approach. We propose an image-based storage, visualization, and implicit interaction paradigm called mnemonic rendering that provides better support for handling visual changes. Once implemented on a system, mnemonic rendering techniques can benefit all applications. We explore its rich design space and discuss its expected benefits as well as limitations based on feedback from users of a small-screen and a wall-size prototype.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1166279.mp4

mp4

126.7 MB

References

  1. Banbury, B. and Tremblay, S., eds. (2004). A cognitive approach to situation awareness: theory and application. Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., and Robertson, G. (2003). High-density cursor: A visualization technique that helps users keep track of fast-moving mouse cursors. Interact. p. 236--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudisch, P. and Gutwin, C. (2004). Multiblending: displaying overlapping windows simultaneously without the drawbacks of alpha blending. ACM CHI Conference. p. 367--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bier, E., Stone, M., Pier, K., Buxton, W., and DeRose, T. (1993). Toolglass and Magic Lenses: The see-through interface. ACM SIGGRAPH. p. 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chang, B., Mackinlay, J., Zellweger, P., and Igarashi, T. (1998). A negotiation architecture for fluid documents. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 123--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chang, B. and Ungar, D. (1993). Animation: From cartoons to the user interface. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 45--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chapuis, O. and Roussel, N. (2005). Metisse is not a 3D desktop! ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cockburn, A., Greenberg, S., Jones, S., McKenzie, B., and Moyle, M. (2003). Improving web page revisitation: Analysis, design and evaluation. Special Issue on Web Navigation Skills, IT & Society, 3(1). p. 159--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards, W. K., Igarashi, T., LaMarca, A., and Mynatt, E. D. (2000). A temporal model for multi-level undo and redo. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Endsley, M., Bolté, B., and Jones, D. (2003). Designing for situation awareness: CRC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman, E. and Fertig, S. (1995). Lifestreams: Organizing your electronic life. AAAI Fall Symposium: AI Applications in Knowledge Navigation and Retrieval.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Grudin, J. (2001). Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. ACM CHI Conference. p. 458--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hunt, A. R. and Andkingstone, A. (2003). Covert and overt voluntary attention: linked or independent? Cognitive Brain Research, 18. p. 102--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutchings, D. R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., and Robertson, G. (2004). Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. ACM AVI Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. p. 32--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hutchings, D. R. and Stasko, J. (2004). Revisiting display space management: understanding current practice to inform next-generation design. Graphics Interface Conference. p. 127--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Itti, L., Rees, G., and Tsotsos, J., eds. (2005). Neurobiology of attention. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacob, R. J. K. (1993). Eye-movement-based human-computer interaction techniques: Toward non-command interfaces. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, D. Hix, Editor. Ablex. chapter 6. p. 151--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaynes, C., Webb, S., Steele, R. M., Brown, M., and Seales, W. B. (2001). Dynamic shadow removal from front projection displays. IEEE Visualization. p. 175--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kawasaki, Y. and Igarashi, T. (2004). Regional undo for spreadsheets. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Demo abstract.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurlander, D. and Feiner, S. (1992). A history-based macro by example system. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 99--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mertz, C., Chatty, S., and Vinot, J. (2000). Pushing the limits of ATC user interface design beyond S&M interaction: the DigiStrips experience. 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Moscovich, T. and Hughes, J. F. (2004). Navigating documents with the virtual scroll ring. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 57--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rekimoto, J. (1999). Time-machine computing: a time-centric approach for the information environment. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Renaud, K. (2000). Expediting rapid recovery from interruptions by providing a visualization of application activity. OZCHI. p. 348--355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53. p. 245--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ringel, M. (2003). When one isn't enough: An analysis of virtual desktop usage strategies and their implications for design. ACM CHI Conference (Ext. Abstracts). p. 762--763. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Salembier, P. and Marques, F. (1999). Region-based representations of image and video: Segmentation tools for multimedia services. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 9(8). p. 1147--1169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Skopik, A. and Gutwin, C. (2005). Improving revisitation in fisheye views with visit wear. ACM CHI Conference. p. 771--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Smith, G. M. and schraefel, m. c. (2004). The radial scroll tool: scrolling support for stylus- or touch-based document navigation. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tam, J. and Greenberg, S. (In press - accepted 2005). A framework for asynchronous change awareness in collaborative documents and workspaces. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tomitsch, M. (2003). Trends and evolution of window interfaces. Thesis, University of Technology: Vienna.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Turk, M. (2004). Computer vision in the interface. Communications of the ACM, 47(1). p. 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Varakin, D. A. and Levin, D. T. (2004). Unseen and unaware: Implications of recent research on failures of visual awareness for human-computer interface design. Human-Computer Interaction, 19. p. 389--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Venolia, G. D., Dabbish, L., Cadiz, J. J., and Gupta, A. (2001). Supporting email Workflow. Tech Report MSR-TR-2001-88. Microsoft Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Vertegaal, R., Mamuji, A., Sohn, C., and Cheng, D. Media eyepliances: using eye tracking for remote control focus selection of appliances. ACM CHI Conference (Extended Abstracts). p. 1861--1864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wang, X. and Jin, J. (2001). A quantitative analysis for decomposing visual signal of the gaze displacement. Pan-Sydney area workshop on visual informtaion processing conference on visual information processing 2001. p. 153--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wexelblat, A. and Maes, P. (1999). Footprints: History-rich tools for information foraging. ACM CHI Conference. p. 279--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Whittaker, S. and Sidner, C. (1996). Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. ACM CHI Conference. p. 276--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Woods, D. D. and Watts, J. C. (1997). How not to have to navigate through too many displays. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Mnemonic rendering: an image-based approach for exposing hidden changes in dynamic displays

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '06: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2006
      354 pages
      ISBN:1595933131
      DOI:10.1145/1166253

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader