skip to main content
10.1145/1167350.1167372acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Laser intensity vehicle classification system based on random neural network

Published:18 March 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a Laser Intensity Vehicle Classification System (LIVCS) based upon imagery obtained from range sensors (called LIVCS). Current systems that utilize loop detectors, video cameras, and range sensors have deficiencies. The loop detectors have high failure rates due to pavement failures and poor maintenance. Video based systems and range sensors do not perform well in deteriorated atmospheric conditions (such as rain and fog). The developed generations of image based range sensors offer the promise of sensors that are less sensitive to deteriorated environmental conditions. LIVCS system extracts features of laser intensity images, produced by laser sensory units. These features are used to train a random neural network (RNN). The LIVCS system recalls its trained RNN for classification of vehicles. This technique outperforms loop detectors, video cameras, and range data techniques in deteriorated environmental conditions.

References

  1. Avery, R. P., Thomas, C. P., Wang, Y., and Rutherford, G. S., Development of a Length-Based Vehicle Classification System Using Uncelebrated Video Cameras, annual meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gupte, S., Masoud, O., Martin, R. F. K., and Papanikolopoulos, N. P., IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Al-Deek, H. M., Radwan A. E., Mohammed, A. A., and Klodzinski, J. G., evaluating the improvements in traffic operations at a real-life toll plaza with electronic toll collection, ITS J., Vol. 3, No. 3, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Collard, A. and Alves, J., Video system breaks through the barriers of transponder-based tolling, ITS International, January/February 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Abdel-Aty, M. and Pande, A., Classification of Real-Time Traffic Speed Patterns to Predict Crashes on Freeways, annual meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, S. K. and Chang, H., Benefit-cost analysis on application of AVI technologies to toll services, Proceedings, Pacific Rim Transtech Conference, Seattle, Washington, July 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnard, S. T. and Thompson, W. B., Disparity Analysis of images, Technical Report 79-1, Computer Science Department, University of Minnesota at Minneapolis, January 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Marr, D. and Poggio, M., A computational theory of human vision, In Proc. Royal Soc., Lond., Vol. B, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelenbe, E., Random neural networks with negative and positive signals and product form solution, Neural Comput., Gelenbe Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 502--510, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gelenbe, E., and Hussain, K. F., Learning in the Multiple Class Random Neural Network, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 13, No. 6, November 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ackley, D. H, Hinton, G. H., and Sejnowski, T. J., A learning algorithm for Boltzman machines, Cognitive Sci., Vol. 9, pp. 147--169, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Behrens, H., Gawronska, D., Hollatz, J. and Schurmann, B., Recurrent and feedforward backpropagation: Performance studies, in Artificial Neural Networks, T. Kohonen et al., Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, 1991, vol. 11, pp. 1511--1514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Pineda, F. J., Generalization of backpropagation to recurrent and higher order neural networks, in Neural Inform. Processing Syst., D. Z. Anderson, Ed. Woodbury, NY: Amer. Inst. Phys., 1987, p. 602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hai, F., Hussain, K. F., Gelenbe, E., and Guha, R., Video Compression with Wavelets and Random Neural Network Approximations, SPIE Electronic Imaging Conf., San Jose (CA), January 20-26. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bakircoglu, H., and Gelenbe, E., Random neural network recognition of shaped objects in strong clutter, SPIE, Vol. 3307, pp. 22--28, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Atalay, V. and Gelenbe, E., Parallel algorithm for color texture generation using the random neural network model, Int. J. Pattern Recognition Artificial Intell., Vol. 6, No. 2--3, pp. 437--446, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gelenbe, E., and Hussain, K. F., Learning and generating color textures with recurrent multiple class random neural networks, SPIE Electronic Imaging Conference, San Jose (CA), January 20-26, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hussain, K. F. and Kaptan, V., Modeling and Simulation with Augmented Reality, International Journal on Operations Research, Vol. 38 No. 2, P. 89--104, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gelenbe, E., Hussain, K. F., and Kaptan, V., Simulating autonomous agents in augmented reality, Article in Press, Journal of Systems and Software, available online February 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gelenbe, E., Neural Networks Advances and Applications II, Amsterdam, Netherlands Elsevier, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ghanwani, A., Neural and delay based heuristics for the Steiner problem in networks, European J. Operations Res., Vol. 108, pp. 241--265, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kandel, E. C., and Schwartz, J. H., Principles of Neural Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands Elsevier, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Abdelbaki, A. H., and Gelenbe, E., Analog hardware implementation of the Random Neural Network model, in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, July 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Abdelbaki, H. E., Hussain, K. F., and Gelenbe, E., A Laser Intensity Image Based Automatic Vehicle Classification System, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference proceedings, Oaklad (CA), August 25-29, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Canny, J. F, Finding edges and lines in images, Master's thesis, MIT, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Laser intensity vehicle classification system based on random neural network

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ACM-SE 43: Proceedings of the 43rd annual Southeast regional conference - Volume 1
      March 2005
      408 pages
      ISBN:1595930590
      DOI:10.1145/1167350

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 March 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate134of240submissions,56%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader