skip to main content
10.1145/1179295.1179341acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Teaching strategies and assessment measures for rapidly changing technology programs

Published:30 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Technology changes rapidly in the Computer Graphics field and the faculty find themselves continually updating and changing their courses to keep step with current changes in the technology, both in hardware and software. Course consistency in the form of learning objectives and outcomes is an important assessment measure. Many problems can arise in assessment while keeping up with the technology, to the point where some assessment measures may become obsolete. In response to that, this paper will explore a number of questions that deal with the issue of rapidly changing technology within the learning situation along with assessing a program in this type of environment. Additionally, this paper will address a number of questions including: How does an educator keep up, and what is the significance in teaching the "old" technology verses the "new" or "upgraded" technology? How do educators assess student success? How does an educator assess the technology skill level and set a base for continued course assessment throughout a degree program? This paper will also explore the possibilities of setting up accreditation options to prepare for future computer graphics accreditation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a45-whittington-high.mov

mov

64.8 MB

a45-whittington-low.mov

mov

23.5 MB

References

  1. ABET Technology Accreditation Commission Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs November 1, 2003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, Dan, Custer, Rodney, and Schmidt, Klaus (2004) "A National Benchmark Study of Computer Technology Related Programs in Industrial Technology" in Journal of Industrial Technology Volume 20 Number 4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Colwell, J., Whittington, J., Higley, J, "Tools for Using Course-Embedded Assessment to Validate Program Outcomes and Course Objectives," 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Elrod, D. and Stewart, M. D., "Assessing Student Work In Engineering Graphics and Visualization Course," The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, Spring, 2005, volume 69, Number 2, pages 16--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ebert-May, Diane. Classroom Assessment Techniques Scoring Rubrics http://flaguide.org/cat/rubrics/rubrics1.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hartman, N. W. and Branoff, T. J., "Learning Theories: Applications for Instruction in Constraint-Based Solid Modeling and Other Engineering Graphics Topics," The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, Spring, 2005, volume 69, Number 2, pages 6--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Henderson, B., Jeruzal, C., Pourmovahed, A., 2002, "Assessment of Student Cognitive Development in the Energy Systems Laboratory," Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, June 16--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Land, R. and Hager, W., 2002, "Pilot Survey: Graduate Satisfaction with ET Education at Penn State," Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, June 16--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Moskal, Barbara M. (2003) "Recommendations for developing classroom performance assessments and scoring rubrics". Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 8 (14)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Montgomery, Susan M. "Addressing Diverse Learning Styles Through the Use of Multimedia" ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education '95 Session 3a2 - MULTIMEDIA 1. http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie95/3a2/3a22/3a22.htm}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Schafer, Lisa (1999-2004) Rubrics in the Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, Bob Hoffman Editor (San Diego State University) http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/rubrics/index.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Slater, Timothy F. Classroom Assessment Techniques Performance Assessment http://flaguide.org/cat/perfass/perfass1.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Whittington, Jana. Education; The Process of Effective Critiques, ELSEVIER Publication, Computer Graphics Journal, # 28, pages 401--407, June 2004. www.elsevier.com/locate/cag (Peer reviewed and Invitational)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wiggins, Grant (1990) "The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation," 2(2) http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/T001% 2006-07%20TAC%20Criteria%2012-19-05.pdf, page 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Teaching strategies and assessment measures for rapidly changing technology programs

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGGRAPH '06: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators program
          July 2006
          246 pages
          ISBN:1595933646
          DOI:10.1145/1179295

          Copyright © 2006 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 July 2006

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGGRAPH '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader