skip to main content
10.1145/1179295.1179346acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Immersive chemistry video game

Published:30 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

A team at Purdue University has been working on a NSF sponsored project to create a set of research-validated recommendations for the development of science video games. As a way to accomplish this task, the team created a three-dimensional first-person shooter video game that requires players to utilize chemistry knowledge to advance in the game-world. A team of chemistry, computer graphics technology, computer science, and instructional designers collaborated in the development of the game and in conducting the research. This paper details the process used by the team. Results from human subject testing will be presented at the conference.

References

  1. Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J. and Adams, C. (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology. 30(4), 311--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Arasasingham et al. (in press). Assessing the Effect of WebBased Learning Tools on Student Understanding of Stoichiometry Using Knowledge Space Theory, Journal of Chemical Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, L. J. (1992). Mass spectra and the Macintosh isotope pattern calculator: A program to calculate isotopic ratios for molecular fragments. Journal of Chemical Education. 69, 811.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Banks, A. J., Holmes J. L., Kotz, J. C., Young, S., Schatz, P. F., and Moore, J. W. (1997). Periodic Table Live! Journal of Chemical Education. 74, 445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Birk, J. P. and Kurtz, M. J. (1999). Effect of experience on retention and elimination of misconceptions about molecular structure and bonding. Journal of Chemical Education. 76(1), 124--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge, Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 873--878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bunce, D. M. (2001). Does Piaget still have anything to say to chemists? J. Chem. Educ. 78(8), 1107--1121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bunce, D. M., Gabel, D., Samuel, J. (1991). Enhancing Chemistry Problem-Solving Achievement Using Problem Categorization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28(6) 505--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Camaioni, L., Ercolani, A. P., Perrucchini, P., and Greenfeild, P. M., (1990). Video games and cognitive ability: The transfer hypothesis. Italian Journal of Psychology. 17(2), 331--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Celnik, P. and Cohen, L. G. (2003). Functional relevance of cortical plasticity. In Boniface, S. and Ziemann, U. (Eds.), Plasticity in the human nervous system: Investigation with transcranial magnetic stimulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chasteen, T. G. (2001). News from online: Teachng with chemical instrumentation on the web. Journal of Chemical Education. 78(9), 1144--1148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chen, C. (1999). A protocol analysis model for investigating computer supported problem-solving activities. Office Systems Research Journal. 17(2), 35--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Collis, B. A., Knezek, K-W. L., et al. (1996). Children and Computers in School. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Doolittle, John H. (1995). Using riddles and interactive computer games to teach problem-solving skills. Teaching of Psychology. 22(1), 33--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Furio, C., Calatayud, M. L., Barcenas, S. L., and Padilla, O. M. (2000). Functional fixedness and functional reduction as common sense reasonings in chemical equilibrium and in geometry and polarity of molecules. Science Education. 84, 545--565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gabel, D., (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 548--554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gillespie, R. J., Spencer, J. N. and Moog, R. S. (1996). Bonding and molecular geometry without orbitals - the electron domain model. Journal of Chemical Education. 73, 622--626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Granath, P. L. and Russell, J. V. (1999). Using games to teach chemistry: 1. The Old Prof card game. Journal of Chemical Education. 76(4), 485--486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Green, C. S. and Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature. 423, 534--537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Harp, S. F. and Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology. 89(1), 92--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. HEUREKA-KLETT (2002). Chemicus. Berlin: Tivola Publishing. Holman, R. W. (2001). Organic CD, version 3.00. Journal of Chemical Education. 78(12), 1603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. JCE SOFTWARE (2003). Software listing at the Journal of Chemical Education, http://www.jce.divched.org/JCESoft/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobsen, J. J. and Moore, J. W. (2000). Chemistry Comes Alive! Volumes 1 and 2. Journal of Chemical Education. 77(5), 671--672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jacobson, M. J. and Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: an empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Katz, R. N. (1999). Dancing with the Devil: Information Technology and the New Competition in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kelly, G. J. and Crawford, T. (1996). Students' interaction with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 693--707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kemp, K. C. (1988). A novel, simple and inexpensive model for teaching VSEPR theory. Journal of Chemical Education. 65(3), 222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kotz, J. C. and Treichel, P. M. (2003). Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity, 5th ed., Thomson and Brooks/Cole.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotz, J. C. and Young, S. (1995) Chemistry Navigator. Journal of Chemical Education Software. 6C2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Markham, J. R. (1998). Flying over atoms CD-ROM. Journal of Chemical Education. 75, 247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Martinez-Jimenez, P., Pontes-Pedrajas, A., Climentbellido, M. S., and Polo, J. (2003). Learning in chemistry with virtual laboratorios. J. Chemical Education. 80(3), 346--352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way Street between cognition and instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 89, 55--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Mayer, R. E. and Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Mabrouk, P. A. (1996). An exciting approach to student learning in analytical chemistry: It's Jeopardy! The Chemical Educator. 1(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Mckenna A. G. and Mckenna, J. F. (1984). Teaching VSEPR theory: The dilemma of five-coordination. Journal of Chemical Education. 61(9), 771--773.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Merzenich, M. M., Wright, B. A., Jenkins, W., Xerri, C., Byl, N., Miller, S., and Tallal, P. (2002). Cortical plasticity underlying perceptual, motor, and cognitive skill development: Implications for neurorehabilitation. In Johnson, M. H. and Munakata, Y. (Eds.), Brain development and cognition: A reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakhleh, M. B. and Krajcik, J. S. (1993). A protocol analysis of the influence of technology on students' actions. Verbal commentary and thought processes during the performance of acid-base titrations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Noh, T. and Scharmann, L. C. (1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 199--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Paulisse, K. W. and Polik, W. F. (1999). Use of WWW discussion boards in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 704--708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Raghavan, K., Sartoris, M. L., and Glaser, R. (1998). Why does it go up? The impact of the MARS curriculum as revealed through changes in student explanations of a helium balloon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 547--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Roberts, R. M. and Traynham, J. G. (1976). Molecular geometry: As easy as blowing up balloons. Journal of Chemical Education. 53(4), 233--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Paiva, J. C. M., Gil, V. M. S., and Correia, A. F. (2003). Le Chat: Simulation in Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education. 80(1), 111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Parker, J. (1997). VSEPR theory demo. Journal of Chemical Education. 74(7), 776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Parrill, A. L. and Gervay, J. (1996). The stereochem game: Making chemistry more fun. The Chemical Educator. 1(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Paulisse, K. W. and Polik, W. F. (1999). Use of WWW discussion boards in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 704--708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Pence, L. E. (1999). Cooperative electronic email: Effective communication technology for introductory chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 697--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Pfennig, B. W. and Frock, R. L. (1999). The use of molecular modeling and VSEPR theory in the undergraduate curriculum to predict the three-dimensional structure of molecules. Journal of Chemical Education. 76(7), 1018--1022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Pieroni, O. I., Vuano, B. M. and Ciolino, A. E. (2000). Classroom innovation: Games to make chemistry more interesting and fun. The Chemical Educator. 5, 167--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Pillay, H. (2003). An investigation of cognitive processes engaged in by recreational computer game players: Implications for skills of the future. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 34 (3), 336--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Rapoport, S. I. (1999). How did the human brain evolve? A proposal based on new evidence from in vivo brain imaging during attention and ideation. Brain Research Bulletin. 50 (3), 149--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Roberts, R. M. and Traynham, J. G. (1976). Molecular geometry: As Easy as blowing up balloons. Journal of Chemical Education. 53(4), 233--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Russell, J. V. (1999). Using games to teach chemistry: An annotated bibliography.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Journal of Chemical Education. 76(4), 481--484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. SERAPHIM (1996). Project SERAPHIM: Clearinghouse for instructional computer information in chemistry. http://ice.chem.wisc.edu/seraphim/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Saloman, G., Perkins, D. N. & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20 (3), 2--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Sanger, M. J. and Badger, S. M. II (2001). Using computerbased visualization strategies to improve students' understanding of molecular polarity and miscibility. Journal of Chemical Eduacation. 78(10), 1412--1416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Sanger, M. J., Phelps, A. J. and Fienhold, J. (2000). Using a computer animation to improve students' conceptual understanding of a can crushing demonstration. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1517--1520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Shaw, C. A. and Mceachern, J. C. (EDS.) (2001). Toward a theory of neuroplasticity. London: Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Shaw, D. E. (1998) Report to the president of the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States: Findings related to research and evaluation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 115--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Sinex, S. A. and Gage, B. A. (2003). Discovery learning in General Chemistry enhanced by dynamic and interactive computer visualization. The Chemical Educator. 8(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith, S. G. and Chabay, R. (1977). Computer games in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 54(11), 688--689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Sterr, A., Elbert, T. and Rockstroh, B. (2002). Functional reorganization of human cerebral cortex and its perceptual concomitants. In Fahle, M. and Poggio, T. (Eds.), Perceptual learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Tissue, B. M. (1996). Applying hypermedia to chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 65--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Towns, M. H. and Grant, E. R. (1997). I believe I will actually go out of this class actually knowing something. Cooperative learning activities in physical chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 34, 819--835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Treadway, W. J. (1996). The multimedia chemistry laboratory: Perception and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 876--878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Tyson, L, Treagust, D. F, and Bucat, R. B. (1999). The complexity of teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education. 76(4), 554--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Whisnant, D. M. (2000). General chemistry multimedia problems. Journal of Chemical Education. 77(10), 1375--1376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Whisnant, D. M. and Mccormick, J. A. (1997). Lake study for Windows update. Journal of Chemical Education Software. 5D1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Williamson, V. M. and Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 521--534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Windschitl, M. and Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 145--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Woodfield, B. F., et al. (in press). The Virtual ChemLab project: A realistic and sophisticated simulation of inorganic qualitative analysis. Journal of Chemical Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Yalcinalp, S., Geban, O. and Ozkan, I. (1995). Effectiveness of using computer-assisted supplementary instruction for teaching the mole concept. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 1083--1095.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Zare, R. N. (2002). Visualizing Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 79(11), 1290--1291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Zielinski, T. J. (2001). MathCad in the chemistry curriculum: Using symbolic software to facilitate learning. Journal of Chemical Education. 78(2), 270--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Immersive chemistry video game

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGGRAPH '06: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators program
          July 2006
          246 pages
          ISBN:1595933646
          DOI:10.1145/1179295

          Copyright © 2006 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 July 2006

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGGRAPH '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader